Object

Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Representation ID: 55873

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Gavin & Sheila Tilstone & Holden

Representation Summary:

Surgery and school only accessible by car. Narrow country lanes with no footways.
Site remote from major amenities; not accessible on foot, only by car.
Access from dangerous and busy road. No street lighting and slowing/turning already extremely dangerous.
Noise from Banbury Road and M40.
Undue pressure on infrastructure and services (health and schools in particular)
Concentration of sites in south rather than distributed more evenly.

Full text:

GT09 - Land to the north east of M40

We are writing to object to the "Gypsy and Traveller Site Options" outlined in the Draft Local Plan concerning the site at GT09 - Land to the north east of M40.

The reasons we object to these plans are:
* Although there is a GP surgery and school in Bishops Tachbrook, these are only accessible by car as pedestrian access is only via the busy Banbury Road and narrow country lanes with no footpaths. The site is very remote from major amenities.
* The access to the site would be from the extremely dangerous and busy Banbury Road. There is no street lighting on this stretch of road and slowing down and turning is already extremely dangerous.
* A site in this location is only accessible by car, there are no local amenities (shops, schools, doctors etc.) which are accessible on foot.
* There is considerable noise from the Banbury Road, especially during peak hours. There is also noise from the adjacent M40.
* Developing a site in this location would place undue pressure on the local infrastructure and services, particularly the provision for health and schools in the local area.
* All of the proposed sites are concentrated in the South of the county.18 of the sites are situated south of Warwick and Leamington Spa rather than being distributed more evenly through the county.

In the above circumstances I would most strongly urge you and your colleagues to look at alternative sites which would be better equipped and suited for travellers since the site is wholly inappropriate.