Object

Revised Development Strategy

Representation ID: 55201

Received: 02/08/2013

Respondent: Robert Ashby

Representation Summary:

Against the loss of amenity that the proposed Thickthorn development would incur because it will degrade seriously the visual character of this entrance to the town forever. A view of new commercial buildings on rising ground with traffic lights on the roundabout, a new road and multiple traffic lanes will look like the approach to a large city suburb rather than a small town. This is not necessary and is not acceptable.

Thickthorn developed as all housing - ie without commerce is not acceptable. The town is already too big for its infrastructure and facilities and a huge new housing development would make it even worse for everyone than it is now.

Deplores the loss of significant areas of greenbelt at Gateway and Thickthorn when alternative options are available locally elsewhere. When it is gone, it's gone forever - as they say. This is not good planning.

Full text:

I spent a significant time studying the documentation including a couple of the consultant's reports, attending meetings and discussing various parts of the proposed plan with several people with sensible, professional views and whose opinions I respect.

I am against the loss of amenity that the proposed Thickthorn development would incur because it will degrade seriously the visual character of this entrance to the town forever. A view of new commercial buildings on rising ground with traffic lights on the roundabout, a new road and multiple traffic lanes will look like the approach to a large city suburb rather than a small town. This is not necessary and is not acceptable.

Thickthorn developed as all housing - ie without commerce is not acceptable either. The town is already too big for its infrastructure and facilities and a huge new housing development would make it even worse for everyone than it is now.

I am horrified at the quantity of new housing proposed in Warwick district overall when the expected need is much less.

I deplore the loss of significant areas of greenbelt at Gateway and Thickthorn when alternative options are available locally elsewhere. When it is gone, it's gone forever - as they say. This is not good planning.