Object
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 54956
Received: 14/07/2013
Respondent: Mr David Clough
Objects to RDS on the following grounds:
* The plan pushes building to the south, east and west of the area, never to the north.
* The north is green belt but that did stop the Council agreeing to building a large new business complex on green belt land in the north.
Traffic:
*People in the south will be bogged down with traffic jams,pollution etc. There will be so much traffic pedestrians will not be able to cross the roads to use the small amount of services that are provided
Environment and Urban Sprawl:
* The loss of farm land is again leading to urban sprawl in the south of the district.
* Warwick Gates is an urban Sprawl nowhere near Warwick and now the Council want to stick more and more on the end of it.
Council still not getting the idea that people in the south are fed up with the brunt of its failure to plan for the district not your friends in Northumberland Ave.
Again we have to rebut the the ideas of the district council. We have a plan that pushes building to the south,east and west of the area, never to the north. I hear you saying that the north is green belt but that did stop you agreeing to building a large new business complex on green belt land in the north.
Looking at the Transport,Doctors,leisure and all local facilities we in the south will be bog down with traffic jams,pollution etc. there will be that much traffic we will not be able to cross the roads to use the small amount of services that are provided. The loss of farm land is again leading to urban sprawl in the south of the district.
You have built Warwick Gates an urban Sprawl nowhere near Warwick and now you want to stick more and more on the end of it.
You are still not getting the idea that we in the south are feed up with the brunt of your failure to plan for the district not your friends in Northumberland Ave..