Object

Revised Development Strategy

Representation ID: 54771

Received: 25/07/2013

Respondent: Mr William Blagburn

Representation Summary:

Housing:
Warwick University does not show any further development of residential areas over the period of the next 15 years - is this correct? If it is omitted will it prevent them from such developments?

Coventry & Warwickshire Gateway development does not show any additional residential development in the local area to cater for the persons requiring accommodation to fill the 10,000 jobs.
Baginton has only 70 - 90 houses planned.

Kenilworth (Thickthorn ) has 700 houses planned but this is nearly 5 miles away by road and already has a designated employment area
Can this be deemed as sustainable development?

Full text:

Housing Requirement

Warwick University does not show any further development of residential areas over the period of the next 15 years - is this correct? If it is omitted will it prevent them from such developments?

Coventry & Warwickshire Gateway development does not show any additional residential development in the local area to cater for the persons requiring accommodation to fill the 10,000 jobs.
Baginton has only 70 - 90 houses planned. Kenilworth (Thickthorn ) has 700 houses planned but this is nearly 5 miles away by road and already has a designated employment area
Can this be deemed as sustainable development?

District Wide Transport Mitigation Proposals

Mitigation Proposal already determined by S106 agreements have not been included in the plan - is this by design?
ie Gibbet Hill (Warwick University
A46 access at Stoneleigh - (Stoneleigh Park & Gateway)
B4113 New Traffic Island (Stoneleigh Park) B4115 New entrance (Stoneleigh Park)

I will be pleased if you will respond to this email as I wish it to go forward to the consultation and will re submit it if it is not acceptable in this present form.