Ref: The Warwick DC Local Plan
I write to raise my strongest objection to the 2013 Local Plan, and the many planning applications that are associated with it - those that are currently under consideration, and those that are undoubtedly yet to come.
This revised local plan unfairly places the bulk of the proposed housing in one concentration to the south of Warwick/Leamington and around Whitnash.
Scale and proportion
 Keeping Bishop's Tachbrook as a village  massive long term coalescence of settlements,  loss of significant open space,  loss of local countryside,  loss of agricultural land,  lead to significant urban sprawl.  excessive bulk and scale,  significant overdevelopment of the area
The effect of these potential developments on the existing local communities and infrastructure will be devastating, and I believe have been grossly underestimated by both Warwick DC and the developers. How many more homes need to be built before Bishop's Tachbrook is no longer a village and is absorbed into Whitnash and Warwick gates. We pay a premium to live in a village, house hold bills are higher and in our home in Holt Avenue which backs onto a field where you wish to put new homes we will hear an increase in traffic volume and pollution. We suffer already in the summer with low water pressure and this has affected my home twice in the last week alone with the warmer weather.
Effect on local road traffic/infrastructure
The road infrastructure south of Warwick/Leamington and around Whitnash is already stretched.
 2 or more cars per household,  9000 extra vehicles using the local road network.  The local road infrastructure is inadequate. (e.g congestion on various local roads)  traffic heading towards the town centers is already a major problem,  Gridlock, increased pollution etc.  congestion on rural roads outside the town at peak times is also already a problem  traffic noise,  Potential increased danger to pedestrians and children.
The National Planning Policy Framework, Policy DC7 states: "Policy DC7 goes onto highlight that development will not be permitted where it generates significant road traffic movements, unless mitigation measures are used to avoid adverse impacts."
These developments will generate significant road traffic movements, and I do not believe that mitigation measures will alleviate the problem, certainly on a local level. If all the developments in the area are given the go ahead as part of the Local Plan, the situation will become untenable.
Effect of local services/amenities
The National Planning Policy Framework, Policy DP2 states: "That development will not be permitted where it has an unacceptable adverse impact on the amenity of nearby uses and residents and/or does not provide acceptable standards of amenity for future users / occupiers of the development."
 pressure on local schools/teachers  primary schools already oversubscribed year on year  increased pressure on the local secondary schools  effect on catchment areas  effect on applications from siblings of children already in one school  new schools not "guaranteed" to be built as part of the developments  limited access if any to doctors and dentists surgeries in Bishop's Tachbrook,Whitnash, Warwick Gates and Myton areas already  effect on increased numbers on the local hospitals
Flood Risk
 Field backing onto Holt Avenue floods on a regular basis like my own back garden  already flood issues in Whitnash and Warwick Gates  scale and density of proposed housing,  large areas of paved/concreted or tarmac surface etc,
Alternatives to the Local Plan
There are many reasons why the Local Plan represents a disaster for the whole of the South Warwick/Bishop's Tachbrook/Leamington/Whitnash areas, predominantly because of the sheer concentration of most of the districts proposed new housing in one relatively small area.
Alternatives that should be considered include:
 Identifying existing housing that is derelict or currently unoccupied,  Identifying empty industrial units with a view to use the land for brownfield site housing.  Identifying an area in the surrounding countryside to use to build an entirely "new town".  Spreading the numbers of new homes evenly around the district, with lots more much smaller developments.  Smaller developments given to local builders rather than large national firms, thus helping the local economy.
Applications have already been submitted for land that is earmarked to be part of the Local Plan, before the Local Plan has been fully agreed and approved is unacceptable. Such applications should not even be considered until such time as the Local Plan has been clarified and the public consultation completed.
Therefore, I hope you listen to the concerns and suggestions of the residents of your district, and act accordingly. This Local Plan cannot be allowed to come to fruition, and I hope Warwick DC come realize that, withdraw it, and refuse all the various planning applications relating to it, namely:
W/13/0776 - 280 homes at Woodside Farm fields W/13/0606 - 720 homes on Lower Heathcote Farm land, south of Harbury Lane W/13/0603 - 370 homes on land west of Europa Way/South of Gallows Hill W/13/0607 - 220 homes on Hawkes Farm fields W/13/0036 - 200 homes on Grove Farm fields (application on hold) W/13/0464 - large Retirement Community development on Gallagher Land near Heathcote W/13/0858 - upto 100 homes at Fieldgate Lane/Golf Lane, Whitnash
I hope Warwick DC would also refuse any new applications relating to the following:
Myton Garden Suburb - upto 1250 homes Further development South of Gallows Hill - upto 260 homes Former Severn Trent Sewage Works - 225 homes Further development at Grove Farm - 375 homes Whitnash East/South of Sydenham - 500 homes