Object
Revised Development Strategy
Representation ID: 53099
Received: 17/07/2013
Respondent: John Murphy
It is a shame that the 2011 part of this process was so badly carried out - that consultation offered a choice of growth levels and electors voted clearly for LOW LEVELS despite the associated lower levels of infrastructure provision. It was unreasonable to then say that so much higher levels had to be accommodated. What was the point of that consultation?
It is a shame that the 2011 part of this process was so badly carried out - that consultation offered a choice of growth levels and electors voted clearly for LOW LEVELS despite the associated lower levels of infrastructure provision. It was unreasonable to then say that so much higher levels had to be accommodated. What was the point of that consultation?