Support

Revised Development Strategy

Representation ID: 52560

Received: 27/06/2013

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

Representation Summary:

Supports the revised plan. Welcomes a plan based on sound principles and robust evidence to ensure that it provides a solid framework upon which to guide future development.

Believes Preferred Options June 2012 doesn't comply with NPPF and would be found unsound. Pleased the Council has recognised that the Exceptional Circumstances to develop the Green Belt to the North of Leamington do not exist.

New development should be concentrated where there are existing employment opportunities and infrastructure to support the development. Essential for new development to be properly planned and controlled, and where necessary there is adequate investment in new roads and other infrastructure to support that development.

Recent evidence shows that the revised plan may have less traffic congestion, less pollution and improved schools and other facilities than building on North Leamington's Green Belt

Full text:

I recognise the enormity of the task facing Warwick District Council in providing new growth whilst balancing environmental, planning and other objectives. I welcome a Local Plan that is based on sound principles and robust evidence to ensure that it provides a solid framework upon which to guide future development. I believe that the Preferred Options for the New Local Plan published in June 2012 do not comply with the National Planning Policy Framework and that as a consequence the Local Plan would be found unsound at Public Enquiry.
I am pleased that Warwick District Council has recognised that the Exceptional Circumstances to develop the Green Belt to the North of Leamington do not exist and that as a consequence the risks of the Local Plan being found unsound at public enquiry are reduced.
I believe that new development should be concentrated where there are existing employment opportunities and infrastructure to support the development. It also believes it is essential for new development to be properly planned and controlled, and where necessary there is adequate investment in new roads and other infrastructure to support that development.

The Revised Development Strategy fulfils these objectives. Recent evidence shows that the revised plan may have less traffic congestion, less pollution and improved schools and other facilities than building on North Leamington's Green Belt. For these reasons I support the Revised Development Strategy.