Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 48251
Received: 27/07/2012
Respondent: Remi Mobed
I object to your Proposed Preferred Option plans, because you could have adopted those prepared in 2009 for the Core Strategy Plan, which did not require the use of Precious Green Belt Land. These previous plans would have been much less expensive as they did not require the extravagance of a whole new infrastructure, which we do not need.
I am writing to you to object to your Proposed Preferred Option plans, because you could have adopted those prepared in 2009 for the Core Strategy Plan, which did not require the use of Precious Green Belt Land. These previous plans would have been much less expensive as they did not require the extravagance of a whole new infrastructure, which we do not need.