Object
Preferred Options
Representation ID: 46236
Received: 15/06/2012
Respondent: Mr Trevor Wood
Woodside Farm
During the Regional Spacial Strategy consultation a government inspector found in favour of no development on this land. The arguments against development are the same now as they were then so what has changed?
Given the history of disputes over this land with pylons, development etc I am surprised the proposed development has arise again but even more surprised it is in phase one. Is this a ploy against residents to railroad this particular development through as their sensible arguments cannot be answered?
Woodside Farm
During the Regional Spacial Strategy consultation a government inspector found in favour of no development on this land. The arguments against development are the same now as they were then so what has changed?
Given the history of disputes over this land with pylons, development etc I am surprised the proposed development has arise again but even more surprised it is in phase one. Is this a ploy against residents to railroad this particular development through as their sensible arguments cannot be answered?