Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33864

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

The Preferred Options ignores local opinion as the second most popular option for growth at Baginton has been ignored.

The Council should take a more proactive approach to housing allocations and not review the Core Strategy in the event that windfalls come forward at a faster rate.

The land south of Baginton should be allocated as development would be acceptable in the landscape, and with additional mitigation measures the presence of the sewage works would not preclude development. Development could also be located to avoid noise and air quality issues from the Airport. Minerals would also be excavated during development.