Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 33864
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Lenco Investments
Agent: RPS Planning
Representation Summary:
The Preferred Options ignores local opinion as the second most popular option for growth at Baginton has been ignored.
The Council should take a more proactive approach to housing allocations and not review the Core Strategy in the event that windfalls come forward at a faster rate.
The land south of Baginton should be allocated as development would be acceptable in the landscape, and with additional mitigation measures the presence of the sewage works would not preclude development. Development could also be located to avoid noise and air quality issues from the Airport. Minerals would also be excavated during development.