Object

Representation ID: 3185

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

More emphasis should be placed on maintaining, or even increasing, the areas of restraint.

We STRONGLY and particularly object to the invasion of the established area of restraint south of Harbury Lane and furthermore believes that the wording in 17.13 is blatantly misleading in that it suggests that proposal is to provide an "additional area to prevent BT merging with the urban area" when in fact the area of restraint has in fact been significantly reduced