Q-P2.1: Are there any areas where equality and inclusivity in planning needs further attention?

Showing forms 1 to 30 of 84
Form ID: 72323
Respondent: Mr Steve Taylor

No

No answer given

Form ID: 72542
Respondent: Mr Roger Lloyd

No

No answer given

Form ID: 72915
Respondent: Mr Darrell Muffitt

No

No answer given

Form ID: 73313
Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

No

No answer given

Form ID: 73493
Respondent: Mrs victoria Palmer-Gee

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 73494
Respondent: Mr Michael Palmer-Gee

No

No answer given

Form ID: 73798
Respondent: DR Angela Quartermaine Carr

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 73947
Respondent: Mr Joshua Niderost

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 74022
Respondent: Mr Christopher Vincett

Yes

Greenbelt land is not negotiable. If it was designated as greenbelt the reasons are greater now than they were when it was designated. Any restrictions to development on greenbelt must remain.

Form ID: 74083
Respondent: Mrs Wendy Mills

Yes

Need to consider accessibility and inclusive use by all users - wheelchairs, visually handicapped , prams, buggies, mobility scooters. A disabled access study should be undertaken. Allocation of land for burials should also be included.

Form ID: 74210
Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

No

No answer given

Form ID: 74506
Respondent: Mrs Margaret dufty

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 74525
Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Yes

Consider inclusive use for all service users- wheelchairs, visual and hearing impaired, mobility scooters, carers with children and with buggies/prams. A Disabled Access Study is requested. Consider provision of burial grounds.

Form ID: 74645
Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 75026
Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 75306
Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 75309
Respondent: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 75927
Respondent: whitnash town council

No

No answer given

Form ID: 75947
Respondent: Ms Barbara Kuypers

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 76040
Respondent: Mr David Haggarty

No

No answer given

Form ID: 76176
Respondent: Meon Vale Residents Association

Yes

Accessibility standards for footpaths in new development and all new buildings. Designing quiet spaces and places. Level access housing and neighbourhoods. Multi generational homes

Form ID: 76225
Respondent: Mr Peter Furze

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 76301
Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

Yes

Affordable social rented housing and rural transport and connectivity of rural areas.

Form ID: 76930
Respondent: Catherine Hewson

No

No answer given

Form ID: 77261
Respondent: Mr Stephen Lawless

Don't know

No answer given

Form ID: 77532
Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Yes

As noted above, inclusivity and equality, and also accessibility, should be more broadly and more explicitly covered throughout the plan. This is with the purpose of ensuring that the plans provide opportunity for all within our districts, but also to make our places fit for purpose in the future.

Form ID: 77857
Respondent: Mr Craig Mander

Yes

Yes, the advertising of this consultation process has been appalling at best. There is a heavy reliance on the public being able to access the online process and document, which prevents a number of resident groups from participating. The accessibility of the consultation document has been extremely hard to find and ability to fill in on line with out having to cut and past onto word documents despite registering is not acceptable. Whilst there have been consultation events they have been centred in a hand full of large towns, the smaller towns and villages have had nothing and so have not been adequately consulted.

Form ID: 78123
Respondent: Mr David Temple

No

No answer given

Form ID: 78131
Respondent: Stratford Climate Action

Yes

Access to internet, mental health support, childcare.

Form ID: 78459
Respondent: Ms Elizabeth Clarke

Yes

Yes the ability to feedback on these proposals should be made more simple and accessible. I use the computer and internet often and struggled to access and interpret these documents, many peoples views will not be heard.