Q-B9: Should the plan include a policy requiring the safeguarding of sites of national importance, sites of local importance, and other non-designated sites known to make a positive contribution to biodiversity or geodiversity; unless the benefits of the
Q-B1: Please select the option which is most appropriate for South Warwickshire NWBC Response – Option B1a considered most appropriate and applicable in light of opportunity to review designations in the new Local Plan. No further comments. Q-B3: Please select the option which is most appropriate for South Warwickshire NWBC Response – Option B3a considered most appropriate and applicable in light of opportunity to review designations in the new Local Plan. No further comments. Q-B4: Please select the option which is most appropriate for South Warwickshire NWBC Response – No comment or preference. Q-B5: Please select the option which is most appropriate for South Warwickshire NWBC Response – Option B5a considered most appropriate and applicable in light of opportunity to review policies in the new Local Plan. No further comments. Q-B6: Should the South Warwickshire Local Plan introduce Wildbelt designations? NWBC Response –The concept/idea needs more clarity? What land will qualify (criteria?) and how will land be identified, and improvement delivery be achieved? No further comment or preference. Q-B7: Do you agree that it is appropriate to highlight links to the Minerals Plan, avoiding the unnecessary duplication of policy within the SWLP? NWBC Response – Agreed appropriate to highlight links in the new Local Plan. No further comments. Q-B9: NWBC Response – Agreed appropriate to consider including a policy requiring the safeguarding of sites of national importance, sites of local importance, and other non-designated sites known to make a positive contribution to biodiversity or geodiversity in light of opportunity to review policies in the new Local Plan. No further comments.