Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Showing forms 151 to 180 of 211

Form ID: 79021

Respondent: Campaign to Protect Rural England - Warwickshire

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Nothing chosen

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Form ID: 79058

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Supporting documents

File: Barford SWLP March 2023-final.docx

Form ID: 79589

Respondent: Kate Walker

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 79671

Respondent: Lapworth Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

Form ID: 80035

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

Form ID: 80104

Respondent: Pillerton Priors Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Form ID: 80121

Respondent: Mr Smith

Agent: Sworders

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A higher limit is appropriate

Form ID: 80184

Respondent: Pillerton Hersey Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

Form ID: 80216

Respondent: Acres Land & Planning

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

Form ID: 80313

Respondent: Cotswolds National Landscape Board

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

Form ID: 80853

Respondent: A Simpson

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 80881

Respondent: Hugh Priestner

Form ID: 80885

Respondent: Hugh Priestner

Form ID: 80927

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 80962

Respondent: Tanworth in Arden Parish Council

Agent: Tanworth in Arden Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 81107

Respondent: James Bushell

Agent: Framptons

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A higher limit is appropriate

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

Form ID: 81155

Respondent: Oakfield Developments Ltd

Agent: William Brearley

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 81272

Respondent: Redrow Homes Midlands

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Supporting documents

File: Scanned Representation

Form ID: 81311

Respondent: Lesley Coles

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 81324

Respondent: Bill Walker

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 81349

Respondent: Mr Ainscow

Agent: Sworders

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Nothing chosen

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A higher limit is appropriate

Supporting documents

File: Map

Form ID: 81549

Respondent: Catesby Estates Ltd

Agent: Stantec UK Limited t/a Barton Willmore

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Supporting documents

File: Scanned Representation

Form ID: 81731

Respondent: Tracy McAllan

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 81748

Respondent: Mactaggart & Mickel

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

File: Vision Document

Form ID: 81829

Respondent: Mrs Denise Brocklehurst

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 81841

Respondent: CEMEX UK Operations Ltd

Agent: Stantec UK Limited t/a Barton Willmore

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 81869

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Church

Agent: Fisher German

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

No

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

Supporting documents

File: Emailed Representation

Form ID: 82221

Respondent: Christ Church, Oxford

Agent: Savills

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A higher limit is appropriate

Form ID: 82225

Respondent: Magdalen College, Oxford

Agent: Savills

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A higher limit is appropriate

Form ID: 82257

Respondent: Spitfire Homes

Agent: Framptons

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A higher limit is appropriate