BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 47- Special Landscape Areas?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101655
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Zoe Leventhal
Support
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101764
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason
This development is not good for the area
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101776
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs AMANDA VENABLES
Retention of the Special Landscape Areas is important to protect these high quality landscapes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101797
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Teed
The SLA designation does not protect wildlife as it stills allows/does not restrict development. These SLA 'S are valuable to nature and any development must be restricted.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101882
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Object
Potential blocking tactic. We would support a study to identify particularly high quality areas that are considered suitable for designation as a Special Landscape Area and then assess whether this is legitimate within the revised NPPF
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102053
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Heart of England Forest
This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. The Heart of England Forest, whilst not specifically being designated a SLA, much of our land sits within the former Ancient Forest of Arden. Development next to or adjacent to these sites has the potential to negatively impact on wildlife that has established itself in the existing and recently created habitats. Development in and around such sites should be restricted with robust policies and be redirected to areas where the impact on nature would not be so significant.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102071
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Walkden
Agreed
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102309
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr George Taylor
The designation of the “Arden Special Landscape Area” was removed in the 2006 Warwick District Local Plan. The areas previously in this category should have their SLA designation restored and recognised in the Landscape Assessment. There should be no development in these areas as it would destroy the hedgerows and ancient oaks which give rise to a huge diversity of wildlife. Retaining them in isolation in any form of urban setting would destroy the corridors used by the wildlife to move within their territory.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102506
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Karen Rollason
SLAs have not been extended into Warwick district. Why is there an Arden SLA in Stratford district which stops at the Stratford/Warwick border? The SLA Arden designation needs to extend to Warwick district so that B1 is given some protection. B1 is disadvantaged in the current Sustainability Appraisal because of this anomaly.
The policy is far too vague in setting out what protection an area would receive. Any development, by definition, harms the landscape. To destroy a landscape of particular historic significance such as Arden - and particularly Ancient Arden - is appalling. What a legacy for future generations.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102811
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: The Ragley Estate
Asiant : Stansgate Planning
Additional Special Landscape Areas should only be designated, and existing SLAs retained, if there is sufficient evidence to justify why normal landscape policies are inadequate.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103628
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Jenny Stevens
Areas where SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103722
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Wall
SGO4 and associated areas should be reinstated as part of Forest of Arden Special landscape Area
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103779
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Carter
Re-apply Forest of arden special landscape area classification to SG04
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103818
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: H Crook
All of south warwickshire needs this protection, to protect damaging the environment and landscape in these areas of cultural and historic significance
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103922
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Elizabeth White
Please consider BIODIVERSITY-RICH HISTORICAL SITE H03 and the wider area Broad Location ‘Whitnash’= rural Radford Semele:
WHITNASH/RADFORD BROOK
BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN – including RED LIST
GRADE 2 AGRICULTURAL LAND
‘REGIA VIA INTER RADEFORD ET WYTENAS 1285’ = BRIDLEWAY W119 = ‘Greenfield Road’
is at the head of an extensive network of public Bridleways and Footpaths that run down through rural Radford Semele - these ANCIENT PATHS are well-used and much loved
WHITNASH HOLY WELL [MWA7390],
CASTLE HILL FIELD [MWA8287]
RADFORD ROMAN VILLA [MWA1905],
SUGGESTION OF ‘BUILDING A HISTORICAL CENTRE AND MUSEUM CLOSE BY’…
PORTABLE ANTIQUITIES SCHEME FINDS
-OLD MILVERTON
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104010
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Camille Newton
Special landscape Areas should be utilised across the whole of Warwickshire so that Warwick district is not at a disadvantage. Also the wording should be strengthened to restrict development that will cause damage to areas that are important for nature conservation to more suitable and lower value areas.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104359
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Norrie
No problem with this.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104583
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace
N/A
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104905
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Susan Hood
Needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104929
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Ann Colley
These areas need to be protected FROM development, again for visitors to continue to enjoy and bring in revenue to the area.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 105310
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 106678
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Property and Development Group
Asiant : Framptons
Whilst there is logic in maintaining Special Landscape Areas designations within Stratford District, we question their proposed introduction in Warwick District. If Warwick District had areas which warranted being designated as Special Landscape Areas, surely this would have happened in a previous version of their local plan. To simply apply such a policy designation because one exists in Stratford is therefore not supported.
If the policy is taken forward into the pre-submission SWLP any proposed SLAs should be informed and support by a robust evidence base
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 106906
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Historic England
We welcome the intention to designate Special Landscape Areas across both Stratford and Warwick Districts to protect and maintain the distinctive character and appearance of these areas.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 106989
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes
Asiant : Savills
We object to draft Policy Direction 47 as it is not supported by sufficient evidence to designate Special Landscape Areas (SLAs). We also note that further evidence is being produced to inform the landscape character of sites and is expected to be published with the Regulation 19. It is unclear whether new SLAs are being proposed and where these will be located. Therefore, the draft policy is not considered to be justified, as required in NPPF paragraph 36.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107090
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cotswolds National Landscape Board
Yes, the Cotswolds National Landscape (CNL) Board agrees with the approach outlined in Draft Policy Direction 47.
Two of the Special Landscape Areas (SLAs) are located directly adjacent to the CNL, as shown in the map below:
• Cotswold Fringe SLA (west, south and east of Shipston-on-Stour); and
• Ironstone Hill SLA (north east of the CNL).
Key:
• Green shading = Special Landscape Area
• Black hatching = Cotswolds National Landscape
• Grey shading = CNL 3km buffer
The Cotswold Fringe SLA is located within the Cotswolds National Character Area (NCA 107)94 and reflects many of the characteristics of the CNL, particularly Landscape Character Type (LCT) 17 - Pastoral Lowland Vale95. The Ironstone Hill SLA shares many of the characteristics of the north-eastern extremities of the CNL, particularly LCT 6 - Ironstone Hills and Valleys96. The key difference is that the SLAs are areas of particularly high landscape quality at a local level whereas the CNL is an area of particularly high landscape quality at a national level.
The designation of these SLAs helps to conserve and enhance the setting of the CNL and, by extension, helps to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the CNL.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107369
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: National Trust
Special landscape areas – The National Trust properties located in Stratford-on-Avon District Council area are located within many of the designated special landscape areas which seek to protect, enhance, and facilitate better management of the best of the area's landscapes outside the Cotswolds National Landscape. The policy does this by resisting development proposals that would have a harmful effect on the distinctive character and appearance of the relevant SLA. Many of the National Trust properties in the South Warwickshire Local Plan area are integral to the character of such special landscapes and the special landscapes that they are found within contribute towards the special nature of these places.
The National Trust consider that there would be enormous benefit of the existing policy being applied to the whole of the South Warwickshire Local Plan area and would deliver considerable enhancements to the special landscape areas.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107394
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development in these areas, which are valuable for wildlife and legally protected and important species.
Development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant. These areas are key wildlife corridors for protected and important species and form transitional areas, as key wildlife habitats.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107469
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Temple Grafton Parish Council
Fully support
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107490
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: West Northamptonshire Council
– Landscape Designation – Its is noted that the Preferred Options consultation (Draft Policy 47) is proposing to retain the Special Landscape Area (SLA) designations in Stratford-on-Avon District and extend these designations to cover Warwick District. This approach is supported by West Northamptonshire Council. In determining the final boundaries for the SLA designations regard should be given to the SLA designations in West Northamptonshire which are contiguous with the SWLP plan area. These are contained in the adopted Part 2 Local Plans for Daventry https://www.westnorthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/daventry-local-plan-part-2 and South Northamptonshire https://www.westnorthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/south-northamptonshire-local-plan-part-2 .
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107766
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land
Asiant : Savills
We object to draft Policy Direction 47 as it is not supported by sufficient evidence to designate Special Landscape Areas (SLAs). We also note that further evidence is being produced to inform the landscape character of sites and is expected to be published with the Regulation 19. It is unclear whether new SLAs are being proposed and where these will be located. Therefore, the draft policy is not considered to be justified, as required in NPPF paragraph 36.