Other

ID sylw: 95388

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

Special landscape areas should not be touched - the policy suggests they are still 'up for grabs'. Past behaviour of developers means ' does not have a harmful impact' will likely not hold true in reality

Yes

ID sylw: 95480

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cuff

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Other

ID sylw: 95979

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. There is no mention of the Special Landscape Area 97 "Dunsmore and Feldon" which needs to be included. What is the timescale for the SLA designation and will there be a public consultation for it?

Other

ID sylw: 96138

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosemary Collier

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

ID sylw: 96374

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

ID sylw: 96501

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

No insight is provided for a timescale for the SLA designation and the level of public consultation not indicated.
There must be a linkage between Special Landscape Areas and Nation Character Areas.

It should be noted that the National Character Area 96 Dunsmore and Feldon was completely omitted in the appropriate section of supportive evidence in the Sustainability Study (by Lepus Consulting). This calls into question the validity of parts of the HELLA B report.

see B.5.4.1

Yes

ID sylw: 96679

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Gee

a more proactive approach is required to replace lost areas of the Warwickshire Arden landscape

No

ID sylw: 96702

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

Needs to be stronger. Should restrict development at least use lesser landscape value areas.

Other

ID sylw: 96860

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

The character of the landscape of proposed site BW would be changed for ever which would not be an improvement. Building 6700 houses on open fields in an area of scenic beauty will obviously have a harmful impact on the areas distinctive character and appearance

Yes

ID sylw: 97112

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

ID sylw: 97174

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

The SLA's like Feldon should be used to reinforce the protection provided by the AONB Buffer Zone and Areas of Restraint. This can be further enhanced under policy direction 48.

Other

ID sylw: 97194

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sir Thomas White’s Charity and The King Henry VIII Endowed Trust, Warwick

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Additional Special Landscape Areas should only be designated, and existing SLAs retained, if there is sufficient evidence to justify why normal landscape policies are inadequate.

Yes

ID sylw: 97237

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Other

ID sylw: 97770

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Land between Bearley and Wilmcote (BW) contributes to a landscape of scenic beauty which will be severly impacted by the proposed development

Other

ID sylw: 97906

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Areas where SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected.

Yes

ID sylw: 97970

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

I hope that the riverside round Stratford and the are around the Welcombe Hills, which provide spectacular all-round views will be given this status

Yes

ID sylw: 98320

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Elkington

The designation of the “Arden Special Landscape Area” was removed in the 2006 Warwick District Local Plan as the Council decided to delete the SLA policy. The reasons for this were set out in detail in Core Topic Paper 10 Rural Areas (CD/24) as the Council considered that the Revised Local Plan would provide the necessary protection previously provided by the former SLA policy. These areas in the WDC area, such as SG04, should have their SLA designation restored and this should be recognised in the Landscape Assessment section of the plan.

Other

ID sylw: 98532

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Flynn

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Additional Special Landscape Areas should only be designated, and existing SLAs retained, if there is sufficient evidence to justify why normal landscape policies are inadequate.

Yes

ID sylw: 98697

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Areas where SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected.

No

ID sylw: 98726

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ginny White

The SLA designation should restrict development in these areas which are valuable for wildlife.

Other

ID sylw: 98898

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Friends of Radfords Green Environment (FORGE)

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

ID sylw: 99078

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council

Support

Yes

ID sylw: 99693

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

Yes

ID sylw: 100081

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting

Special Landscape Areas are a postive policy

Other

ID sylw: 100151

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Mary Addyman

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

No

ID sylw: 100461

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rebecca Loades

I disagree that development is not restricted for special landscape areas. It absolutely should be restricted.

Yes

ID sylw: 100500

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Areas where an SLA is threatened by development should be protected.

Yes

ID sylw: 100866

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Judy Steele

I agree that special landscape areas should cover the whole of the South Warwickshire area

Other

ID sylw: 101341

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ashberry Strategic Land Ltd

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Additional Special Landscape Areas should only be designated, and existing SLAs retained, if there is sufficient evidence to justify why normal landscape policies are inadequate.

Other

ID sylw: 101625

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes Ltd

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Additional Special Landscape Areas should only be designated, and existing SLAs retained, if there is sufficient evidence to justify why normal landscape policies are inadequate.