Yes

ID sylw: 95248

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

no further comment

No

ID sylw: 95312

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alamo

Asiant : Harris Lamb

Draft policy Direction 40 has the potential to add additional development costs that must be factored into a Viability Assessment produced with the pre-submission draft SWLP. In order for this policy to be included in the Plan, the Council must have an understanding of the impact of this.

Other

ID sylw: 95351

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

Recent large scale development that we have recently seen in Stratford shows that developers ride roughshod over such requirements and preserving/protecting, let alone enhancing, the environmental landscape is not adhered too (and has seemingly not been enforced). Feels a little like lip service/box ticking but won't happen in reality, from recent developments we have seen.

Yes

ID sylw: 95568

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Allan Stewart

Important.

No

ID sylw: 95712

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Wilson Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

No. Draft Policy Direction 40 has the potential to add additional development costs that must be factored into a viability assessment produced with the Pre-Submission SWLP. In order for this Policy to be included in the SWLP the Councils must have an understanding of the impact of this Policy on scheme density, the net to gross development ratio of schemes, and the overall scheme costs.

Yes

ID sylw: 95787

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 95832

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

Provided the policy Direction is adhered to.

Yes

ID sylw: 95888

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Carter

There could be more specific mention of the value of protecting and enhancing the setting/amenity of any watercourses or water features within or adjacent to development site

Yes

ID sylw: 95967

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 96363

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

ID sylw: 96541

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

yes

Yes

ID sylw: 96632

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

The council should use a wide evidence base to ensure good results.

Other

ID sylw: 96683

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Gee

Why not demand that all new developments prohibit the use of plastic grass, as this is misleading to wildlife at best and has no benefit to nature, or biodiversity, or carbon capture.
Ditto slabbing over front gardens to create parking spaces.

Other

ID sylw: 96873

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Site BW is entirely on agricultural land within the Green Belt and planting a few trees on the site would in no way act as a substitute for mature broad leaf trees and hedges. Other sites which are not completely within the Green Belt would be far more appropriate eg E1, F1, F2, F3 and G1

Yes

ID sylw: 97078

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

ID sylw: 97107

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

In addition to following this policy for new developments, this should also apply where housing development has already taken place and GBI could be enhanced to re-balance the community with green space, habitats, parks or gardens. This could form part of a neighbourhood plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 97215

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

No

ID sylw: 97482

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

Draft Policy Direction 40 has the potential to add additional development costs that must be factored into a viability assessment produced with the Pre-Submission SWLP. In order for this Policy to be included in the Plan the Councils must have an understanding of the impact of this Policy on scheme density, the net to gross development ratio of schemes, and the overall scheme costs.

Yes

ID sylw: 97713

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr HUGH KEEP

I thoroughly support the Greening Factor approach.

Other

ID sylw: 97774

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

If a large settlement is developed entirely on productive agricultural land containing hedges and trees and is entirely in the Green Belt, putting a few trees within the development cannot be considered in any way compensation or improvement of GBI. Proposed site BW is an excellent example of this and within the parameters of this Policy, cannot be considered suitable. Other proposed sites such as E1, F1, F2, F3, G1 would be far more appropriate.

Other

ID sylw: 97894

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of
higher biodiversity already in existence is crucial. Research shows that developers aren’t implementing the ecological and biodiversity
enhancements they originally claim to.

Yes

ID sylw: 98364

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Mr Will Whitelock

Catesby Estates are supportive of the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 40.

Yes

ID sylw: 98387

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr

The aims of the approach can't be faulted.

Yes

ID sylw: 98500

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Newbould

No mention of gardens as part of greening factor. These are often very small in new developments as there seems to be a preference to the communal green spaces but I think there should be some value in gardens & the extra level of diversity these can achieve.

No

ID sylw: 98648

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of higher biodiversity already in existence is crucial. Research shows that developers aren’t implementing the ecological and biodiversity enhancements they claim to. Article reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/

It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements which much of the time aren't delivered by developers. The councils needs to update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 98692

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Mr Will Whitelock

Catesby Estates support the approach in Draft Policy Direction 40. The Vision Document and Concept Masterplan for Land South of Allimore Lane propose to enhance Spittle Brook with a green and blue infrastructure corridor, including large wet grassland areas and wildlife ponds to improve biodiversity. Sustainable drainage systems will also be integral, managing surface water while creating habitats. The proposals will offer landscape benefits like new public open space, play facilities, recreational routes, and a community orchard, demonstrating that green and blue infrastructure can be effectively integrated into development.

Yes

ID sylw: 98982

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council

Support - the list could include a reference to orchards

Yes

ID sylw: 99134

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

The challenge here will be to develop a robust method for measuring Green and Blue Infrastructure and avoid duplication with the work done to define the baselines for BNG and ENG.

No

ID sylw: 99328

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Draft Policy Direction 40 has the potential to add additional development costs that must be factored into a viability assessment produced with the Pre-Submission SWLP. In order for this Policy to be included in the SWLP the Councils must have an understanding of the impact of this Policy on scheme density, the net to gross development ratio of schemes, and the overall scheme costs.

Yes

ID sylw: 99667

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

yes