No

ID sylw: 91862

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hanno Kirner

Protecting existing green areas a priority

Yes

ID sylw: 91911

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Research shows that developers aren’t implementing the ecological and biodiversity enhancements they originally claim to. Article reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/ . Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of higher biodiversity already in existence is crucial

No

ID sylw: 92103

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dee McGowan

No. It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

No

ID sylw: 92151

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Patricia Scott

Why is there no reference to grey water systems? every new development should incorporate grey water systems to reduce the use of drinking water for such things as washing cars, watering gardens and flushing toilets.
Green space needs to be available for wildlife corridors to create connectivity between the diminishing populations of our wildlife. This draft policy seems to imply that green space is mostly about what it delivers for humans. What about the needs of our depleted natural environment?

Other

ID sylw: 92263

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

Safeguarding and supporting areas of high biodiversity that already exist is essential - I have read research (wildlifejustice.org- lost nature report) which shows that developers do not implement the ecological and biodiversity enhancements that they claim to.
We have to protect our green spaces.

Other

ID sylw: 92346

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr G Wyatt

Where developments require the loss of more mature trees/hedgerows, the mitigation is often of a poor level. Trees planted often die and are not replaced, etc., as observed in Radford Semele. the mitigation does not work. How can the management of replacement trees be enforced within the framework?

Yes

ID sylw: 92501

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

Other

ID sylw: 92654

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

No comment

Yes

ID sylw: 92656

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Yates

A significant contribution (to be quantified by planners)should be part of the plan

Yes

ID sylw: 92686

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Phillip Johnson

I strongly agree on the need to properly manage the ecological environment. This should include habitats for wildlife, enhancing health and wellbeing outcomes in an area by providing space for recreation, and building resilience to a changing climate including flood control and preventing urban heat islands.

Yes

ID sylw: 92703

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

n/a

Other

ID sylw: 92834

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

There is little evidence to show that developers keep promises to enhance landscapes after development. The only way we can ensure sustainable levels of biodiversity is to protect what we currently have.

Yes

ID sylw: 93012

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

I support existing biodiversity which is high importance.

Other

ID sylw: 93206

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Martina Hunt

Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of higher diversity already in existence is crucial. Research shows that developers are not implementing the ecological and biodiversity enhancements they originally committed to and claimed to. Reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/

Yes

ID sylw: 93329

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr geoff marston

no more to comment

Yes

ID sylw: 93392

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93479

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93551

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

We agree with all these policy directions but they tend to be the last things that developers do and are either not done well or not at all so implementation needs to be monitored and the planning authority must ensure compliance. Planning approval should include penalties if developers do not do what they say they are going to do.

No

ID sylw: 93607

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr JAMES STEWART

I do not agree with this policy because protecting and enhancing existing biodiversity is far more effective than relying on promised enhancements that often go unfulfilled. Safeguarding areas with high biodiversity is crucial to maintaining ecological balance. Research shows that developers frequently fail to implement the biodiversity improvements they claim, with over 50% of “net-gain” commitments existing only on paper. This is a systemic issue and a regulatory failure. Instead of allowing further environmental harm, we must prioritize real conservation efforts. Source: Wild Justice Report

No

ID sylw: 93679

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Claire STEWART

I do not agree with this policy because protecting and enhancing existing biodiversity is far more effective than relying on promised enhancements that often go unfulfilled. Safeguarding areas with high biodiversity is crucial to maintaining ecological balance. Research shows that developers frequently fail to implement the biodiversity improvements they claim, with over 50% of “net-gain” commitments existing only on paper. This is a systemic issue and a regulatory failure. Instead of allowing further environmental harm, we must prioritize real conservation efforts. Source: Wild Justice Report

Yes

ID sylw: 93723

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, but note that green roofs clash with solar rooftop PV and rooftop PV should be the priority.

Yes

ID sylw: 93844

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray

I'd support all this.

No

ID sylw: 94133

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kelly

Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of
higher biodiversity already in existence is crucial. Research shows that developers aren’t implementing the ecological and biodiversity
enhancements they originally claim to. Article reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/

Other

ID sylw: 94154

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

Priority and thought should also be given to protecting areas of existing biodiversity. Developers often don’t fulfill the requirements so areas of important local nature and their surrounding wildlife corridors should be protected.

Other

ID sylw: 94162

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Holly Whittaker

Supporting the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of higher biodiversity already in existence is crucial. Research shows that developers aren't implementing the ecological and biodiversity enhancements they originally claim to. Article reference https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/

No

ID sylw: 94377

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Blandamer

It is crucial to support the existing biodiversity, safeguarding and supporting areas of higher biodiversity already in existence. Research shows that developers aren't implementing the biodiversity and ecological enhancements they originally claim to. Article reference: https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/lost-nature-report/
It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

No

ID sylw: 94639

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Renny Wodynska

Plan states ‘Biodiversity Net Gain’ will be tool to deliver biodiversity ambition /increased diversity of plant and animal life;there is nothing ambitious about current target of 10% net gain. This should be 20%. Other Councils have higher targets. I disagree with removal of Wildbelt Policy. Previous consultations state 80% of respondents supported Wildbelt Policy to designate land for nature recovery. LNRS are different from Wildbelt, latter would safeguard sites in recovery. LNRS is not a designation, and would NOT safeguard areas for nature.There is no updated Green/Blue infrastructure evidence base or detailed strategic policy looking at opportunities for wider corridors.

Other

ID sylw: 94955

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Need to support the existing bio viversity, safeguarding and supporting areas already in existence is crucial.

Other

ID sylw: 95002

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stuart Mace

The manufacturing of the landscape and introduction of "green infrastructure" to replace assets that have been lost by development will result in additional maintenance costs that need to be carefully considered. Existing residents of the area should not see their council tax rise as a result of development in order to maintain those "green infrastructure" assets.

Other

ID sylw: 95078

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Grimes

As costs escalate with newer developments, the first to suffer with cost cuts will be the developers committments to ecology and biodiversity which is always the first to go. Developers guarantees are no longer worth the paper they are written on.