Yes

ID sylw: 98381

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Newbould

Supporter of Warwickshire Wildlife Trust and so hope they would be involved in advising and guiding on maintaining & regenerating the various assets

Other

ID sylw: 98496

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Booth

These aims would be violated by the SG06 development as would remove trees, hedges, open space, farmland and damage the local river. This would reduce biodiversity, habitats and encourage climate change.

No

ID sylw: 98622

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alice Hibbert

The policy does not give detail on how environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when many of the potential sites are next to vital designated Local Wildlife Sites.

No

ID sylw: 98646

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ginny White

How will important environmental assets be protected and enhanced? There doesn't seem to be enough detail, especially given the proximity of important designated Local Wildlife Sites, which are very obviously going to be affected.

No

ID sylw: 98882

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Friends of Radfords Green Environment (FORGE)

The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Other

ID sylw: 98904

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Swifts Local Network: Swifts & Planning Group

In summary, the current references to biodiversity in chapter 11 are very welcome, but please consider building-dependent wildlife such as red-listed bird species which inhabit buildings in South Warwickshire, especially significant here due to the number of unmodernised older buildings which have a greater tendency to host these species.

Therefore, please add: Swift bricks are a universal nest brick for small bird species and should be installed in new developments including extensions, in accordance with best-practice guidance such as BS 42021 or CIEEM. Artificial nest cups for house martins may be proposed instead of swift bricks where recommended by ecologist.

Yes

ID sylw: 98956

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council

support

No

ID sylw: 99016

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul McCloskey

It not that there is much wrong with what is written, BUT......

All the green space, the sites of special interest, SuDs systems etc need to be integrated into one green whole with green corridors so that wildlife can migrate safely and propagate. As things are we have isolated bits of nature that are not connected. I think this is the main priority. We need to see how 30 by 30 is going to work out before we decide where the houses should go.

Yes

ID sylw: 99115

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

The mandate to protect, conserve and enhance must be non-negotiable and in no circumstances should offsetting be allowed. The importance of protected sites for natural flood management where appropriate should be highlighted, cross-referenced to draft Policy J in chapter 7 on flood risks.

A green / blue map identifying all existing sites, options for new sites and connectivity should form part of the plan. For example Finham Brook in Kenilworth from upstream of the castle across Kenilworth down to the wetland area to be created under the HS2 bridge over the Brook.

Yes

ID sylw: 99379

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Tania White

Sites like The Little Haven Moth Nature on the old railway line in Bidford which is part of the Warwickshire County Council Local Biodiversity Action Plan (lbap@warwickshire.gov.uk) and Butterfly Conservation. The County Recorder, an inspect expert and lepidopterist regularly visit to monitor moth numbers as there is an extremely favourable tally and is an important nature reserve within the County. This will be impacted by SG20 if development goes ahead. Save our wildlife

No

ID sylw: 99588

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Howson

Draft Policy 36 - Re: Long Marston Airfield

We are noticing a reduction in species, particularly since development on Meon Vale and the airfield. Including, fewer Newts in the pond, fewer hedgehogs, bats and deer.
We have deer coming into the garden now having been pushed away from the above developed green spaces, and some are hit on the roads.
Creatures appear frightened and tier corridors are cut-off. How will they survive ?
Insects also reduceds as a knock on effect.

No

ID sylw: 99624

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Afolabi Okeshola

I believe there should be minimum acceptable levels set for the proportion of green land maintained within local areas to avoid overdevelopment.

Yes

ID sylw: 99660

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

yes agree

No

ID sylw: 99730

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Stone -Johnston

SG05 - will destroy ancient trees and hedgerows. The impact to this green space will be devastating. Building on green belt land harms both mental health and wildlife. Green spaces provide vital areas for relaxation, reducing stress, promoting overall well-being. Losing these natural environments means fewer opportunities for people to connect with nature, leading to negative effects on mental health.Additionally, green belts are crucial habitats for wildlife, supporting biodiversity and offering refuge for many species. Development disrupts ecosystems, endangering these creatures, reducing the natural balance that benefits both people and wildlife. Protecting green belts is essential for health environmental sustainability.

Yes

ID sylw: 99754

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Waller

Yes i agree with the policy but it would be good to have more info on the species being protected, especially as i am an ecologist

No

ID sylw: 99913

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Simpson

No. The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 99921

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting

I agrre with Draft Policy Direction-36 - Protection of Sites, Habitats and Species

Yes

ID sylw: 99939

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford District Council Green Group

It is difficult to see how biodiversity is going to be enhanced and linked up when so many proposed developments are next to these precious sites. I can't see any reference to 30% by 2030, perhaps the parcels that aren't used for development can be used for this.

Yes

ID sylw: 100031

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Welford on Avon Parish Council

agreed .. a good policy

No

ID sylw: 100135

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Mary Addyman

The policy does not provide detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 100207

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anna Taylor

Protecting sensitive habitats, species, and established wildlife corridors must be a priority in planning decisions. Development near nature reserves and vital wildlife sites threatens biodiversity through habitat destruction, ecosystem fragmentation, and increased noise and light pollution, which disrupt natural behaviours. Clopton Quarter and the Welcombe Hills serve as key ecological areas, supporting diverse flora and fauna. Inappropriate development weakens connectivity between wildlife corridors, reducing species resilience. Planning policies must ensure buffer zones, safeguard green infrastructure, and prioritise biodiversity net gain, preventing irreversible damage to protected landscapes and ensuring long-term ecological sustainability.

Yes

ID sylw: 100392

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Absolutely agree. The local wildlife, particularly in green areas, should be protected. It is essential for our environment.

Yes

ID sylw: 100414

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Parsons

I absolutely agree with the approach laid out

Yes

ID sylw: 100464

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

The plan should also protect established wildlife corridors connected to Local Reserves and wildlife sites. The protection of these sites from noise and light pollution as well as destruction of ecosystems and habitats due to inappropriate development locations need to be taken into consideration.

Yes

ID sylw: 100471

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Aimee Carter

Once we lose this valuable resource we cannot regain it within several generations. Must be protected at all costs.

No

ID sylw: 100531

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr peter spreadbury

I say NO because your large settlements housing plans are 180 degrees opposed to this policy. Small developments allow nature highways to survive. Large settlements leave a wasteland for nature and the public who may welcome our natural fauna and flora to flourish within and around our communities.

Yes

ID sylw: 100559

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Vanessa Chivers

Whilst I agree with the SWLP protection of sites, I would like to note the irreplaceable loss of biodiversity if farms on Hareway Lane X1 are replaced with industrial and housing developments. The land supports protected species such as newts, badgers, owls, muntjac and fallow deer, woodpeckers and red kites. Hareway Lane is flanked by hedgerow and wildlife inhabitants wander aimlessly from one side to the other, hence existing residents only drive 30 mph. Replacement of the single track lane and build would destroy this unique environment. Any biodiverse net gain would be impossible, merely wiping out existing wildlife 100%.

Yes

ID sylw: 100620

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janine McComiskey

Yes!

No

ID sylw: 100752

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Judy Steele

The policy does not provide enough detail on how local nature assets will be protected and enhanced. A large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

No

ID sylw: 100874

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Dave Steele

the plan needs a tree canopy target, as other Councils have done, to be more ambitious at a wider scale.