Yes

ID sylw: 85979

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Susan Archer

This is very important for future generations

Yes

ID sylw: 86011

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kate Harris

It is essential that this policy approach is asserted and enforced

Yes

ID sylw: 86124

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

ID sylw: 86273

Derbyniwyd: 18/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacky Atkinson

Where will the drinking water supply and sewage treatment capacity for the new housing developments come from? Will the full environmental cost of the new developments be taken into account, along with the environmental impacts of current construction schemes, especially HS2, and recently completed schemes?

No

ID sylw: 86311

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Nash

In practice this is unlikely to work

Yes

ID sylw: 86336

Derbyniwyd: 21/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Noel Davis

all should be protected

Yes

ID sylw: 86359

Derbyniwyd: 22/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Professor David Hardiman

Preserving green space is of huge importance, given the fact that there is a massive amount of development taking place in South Warwickshire at present. This includes not just building over a lot of farmland but also HS2, with its swathe of destruction in a belt across the area. This section 36 sets out excellent reasons why green belt land must be preserved. What is does not address is the issue of loss of fertile farmland and the dwindling of our ability to feed ourselves from local produce as a result.

Yes

ID sylw: 86418

Derbyniwyd: 24/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daphne Tilley

We are losing too many habitats as well as vital farmland. A growing population cannot continue to import vast amounts of foodstuff, which is most certainly not eco friendly. We need ALL our farmland.

Other

ID sylw: 86508

Derbyniwyd: 27/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sylvia Ackroyd

Lapworth and surrounding areas would greatly impacted by any development as it is a place teeming with local flora and fauna notwithstanding a place of magnificent historical interest.

No

ID sylw: 86615

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Rachel Smith

You are making it extremely difficult for Shipston residents to express their views. The meeting at the leisure centre today was an absolute joke. The land being discussed for the 1600 houses over the river is already owned by a developer and he already has plans drawn up. This appears to be a box ticking exercise by the council when decisions have already been made. Very disappointed

No

ID sylw: 86698

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

There has been an overwhelming support for Wildbelts. To dismiss this is arrogant and defeats the purpose of consultations such as this.

You should incorporate the Wildbelt attributes into you plan.

No

ID sylw: 86945

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Best way to protect = no more development

Yes

ID sylw: 87059

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

The protection of our countryside, green areas, native species of plants, animals, birds and insects is vital. All new housing/employment builds should pay proper regard to this. Not just provide a few bird boxes. There should be nature corridors within the builds.

Yes

ID sylw: 87095

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

More protection to new spaces is needed.

Yes

ID sylw: 87428

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

ID sylw: 87602

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

ID sylw: 88541

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kathryn Lawry Kennedy

The mandate to protect, conserve and enhance must be non-negotiable and in no circumstances should offsetting be allowed. The importance of protected sites for natural flood management where appropriate should be highlighted, cross-referenced to draft Policy J in chapter 7 on flood risks. A green / blue map identifying all existing sites, options for new sites and connectivity should form part of the plan. For example, Finham Brook in Kenilworth from upstream of the castle across Kenilworth down to the wetland area to be created under the HS2 bridge over the Brook.

Yes

ID sylw: 88799

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Erin Williams

Yes. The mandate to protect, conserve and enhance must be non-negotiable and in no circumstances should offsetting be allowed. The importance of protected sites for natural flood management where appropriate should be highlighted, cross-referenced to draft Policy J in chapter 7 on flood risks. A green / blue map identifying all existing sites, options for new sites and connectivity should form part of the plan. For example, Finham Brook in Kenilworth from upstream of the castle across Kenilworth down to the wetland area to be created under the HS2 bridge over the Brook.

Yes

ID sylw: 88845

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Other

ID sylw: 88854

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jennifer Collett Wright

In sum, I strongly disagree with the proposal to build between Cubbington and Lillington, because in this location we have already suffered increased traffic and irreplaceable losses due to HS2 destruction - valuable arable farmland, wildlife habitats, ancient woodland, veteran trees, and access to tranquil countryside walks via public rights of way.

Yes

ID sylw: 88866

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Lucy Hartley

All good. Reduction in use of poison in other areas could be mentioned as this has a detrimental effect on all through the food chain.

Yes

ID sylw: 89090

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

ID sylw: 89130

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara Bird

agree

Yes

ID sylw: 89170

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth

land owners should not be allowed to clear small tree and brash areas in the hope of getting planning consent as is the case on the Alcester Captains Hill proposed development area

Yes

ID sylw: 89172

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth

but dont build on it so the area remains protected for habitats for nature

Yes

ID sylw: 89218

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanna Hughes

We should also protect established wildlife corridors connected to Nature Reserves and vital wildlife sites. Need to consider the damage to these sensitive sites from noise and light pollution as well as the destruction of ecosystems and habitats as a result of inappropriate development locations.

Yes

ID sylw: 89280

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jon Knight

This would seem a vital part of the plan given that the UK is one of the least biodiverse and ecologically bereft countries in Europe.

Other

ID sylw: 89325

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Wendy Bannerman

Protecting sensitive sites whilst balancing that with public access to outdoor space requires maintenance of PROW and other shared paths as well as clear and consistent waymarking.

Yes

ID sylw: 89427

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Hayles

Warwickshire's rich and varied landscape needs the highest levels of protection against the pressure of over-development which has altered much of the County already.

Yes

ID sylw: 89570

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

This is non-negotiable! Areas for natural flood management are particularly important such as Finham Brook.