Yes

ID sylw: 91480

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Michelle Mendoza

n/a

No

ID sylw: 91513

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mary Adams

The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 91549

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

This is vitally important

Yes

ID sylw: 91710

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

ID sylw: 91786

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

N/A

No

ID sylw: 91817

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tim Burridge

No. The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 91860

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hanno Kirner

Need to protect exiting green belt and nature reserves

Yes

ID sylw: 91906

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Established wildlife corridors connected to Nature Reserves and vital wildlife sites must be protected. Consideration should be given to the damage to these sensitive sites from noise and light pollution as well as the destruction of ecosystems and habitats as a result of inappropriate development locations. Particular consideration should be given to greenbelt sites adjacent to existing wildlife corridors and habitats such as the Clopton Corner part of SQ18 adjacent to the Welcome Hills.

Other

ID sylw: 92034

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Valerie Whittaker

I cannot see how building on Green Belt and needed farm land complies with protection of the area and habitats.

Yes

ID sylw: 92062

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Oliver Grice

All agreed.

No

ID sylw: 92108

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dee McGowan

No. The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Other

ID sylw: 92154

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Patricia Scott

Both Stratford and Warwick Council planning departments have proven themselves incapable of delivering on the protection of species and habitats

No

ID sylw: 92284

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Spelman

The NPPF published December 2024 states the importance of Local Nature recovery strategies and requires the local authorities to connect them to features of nature conservation and buffer them from development. The proposal to build thousands of houses on the county boundary with Solihull does not meet this requirement . Species and habitats do not respect administrative boundaries and therefore S Warks should take more account of the impact of its housing plans on Solihull’s nature conservation strategy. The lowland heath of Hockley Heath supports protected species and its green infrastructure helps mitigate the effects of climate change especially flooding.

Yes

ID sylw: 92285

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr G Wyatt

The more protection and anhancement given to sites, the better. My concern is that many connectivity corridors for wildlife between sites will be destroyed by the encroaching new developments. In spite of having limited development near my home, for example, the species count for birds, insects etc has decreased massively over the last few years, so reducing the foraging opportunities for animals has already had a devastating effect on the directly observable numbers and range of organisms. Of course, many factors are at work, but the loss of the natural environment must play a huge role.

Yes

ID sylw: 92360

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Wilkinson

This policy is essential to protect what little we have left of our countryside.
It should be strictly enforced.

Yes

ID sylw: 92428

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Christine Slaughter

Protect established wildlife habitats, ecosystems, corridors and Nature Reserves. We need to reduce noise and light pollution near these sites.

No

ID sylw: 92439

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ted and Zbigniew Jasinski

The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 92497

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 92641

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Yates

Any sssi sites can be moved without damage/harm to the specific interest as biologists have stated when building HS2. ISSI sites should not stop Infrastructure/residential or commercial developments when these can be successfully moved.

Yes

ID sylw: 92682

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Phillip Johnson

I agree.

Yes

ID sylw: 92696

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Briggs

I agree with the approach, but much more is needed. The catastrophic decline in insects, birds and wild mammals populations in the last few decades will not be reversed without substantial environmental improvement being incorporated in all new developments, of whatever type.
Every field and hedge should be designated to protect and support wildlife, including appropriate land management, particularly in the area designated as 'Forest of Arden', in which further development must be minimised.

Yes

ID sylw: 92699

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

Yes - but only if it means that green belt is protected and not used for large housing developments - for example the proposed site at Hatton or employment site at Wedgnock Farm, Warwick.

No

ID sylw: 92720

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Luke Kempton

No. The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites

Yes

ID sylw: 92770

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Craig Fellowes

Simply whilst this states that the environment should be considered it is not in relation to B1. There are protected species on this site and full ecological survey by an independent person should be carried out. The council have a legal duty under S40 NERC to protect biodiversity and they are failing again and again. This is a criminal offence.

Yes

ID sylw: 92821

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

We should not underestimate the value of our hedgerows in the rural-urban fringe. Too many of these locations have been lost and their ecological value in supporting food chains should not be underestimated.

Yes

ID sylw: 92996

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Stratford should always protect wildlife corridors & wildlife ecosystems & habitats. Sensitive sites should be protected from housing & inappropriate development.

Yes

ID sylw: 93033

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

I'm a bit sorry this is item 11. seems to me it should be top of the requirements of the plan

Yes

ID sylw: 93196

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Martina Hunt

This policy is imperative for environmental protection of sites, habitats and Species. Clopton Quarter nestles adjacent to the Clopton nature reserve and Welcombe Hills country park with a vast array of wildlife, the habitat of which is already increasingly being diminished, e.g. Roe deer. Corridors help, but a wider protection of this landscape and habitat are essential. If you walk the Monarch way adjacent to SG18, you will see from the hills how such a development will encroach on the visual aesthetics and open landscape. Connecting the river walk with the footpaths of the Welcombe Hills could be advantageous environmentally.

No

ID sylw: 93223

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kim Salmon

The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated local wildlife sites

No

ID sylw: 93323

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr geoff marston

I am concerned as the policy provides limited detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced. This particularly as large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.