Yes

ID sylw: 86095

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 86468

Derbyniwyd: 26/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs vivien bryer

Very sound reasoning.

Yes

ID sylw: 86675

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Double Glazing to Listed Buildings - Requirements such as "No double glazing in listed buildings" need to be revisited. Listed buildings should use every reasonable methods to reduce energy usage.

No

ID sylw: 86925

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Not competitive or workable

Yes

ID sylw: 87073

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 87174

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Bryan Hay

Sensible approach.

Yes

ID sylw: 87405

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

Again, how can heritage buildings be encouraged / supported to be more energy efficient taking advantage of new technologies?

No

ID sylw: 87585

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I do not agree

Yes

ID sylw: 88712

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 89266

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jon Knight

Supporting building standards and requirements that improve the "negawatts" at building (doesn't) consume is good. Again I'd ask whether some of the "should" items can be turned into "must" to enforce the requirements?

Yes

ID sylw: 89475

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

I love the conversation areas. Yes we do need conversations about conservation areas and the challenges of retrofitting to achieve energy savings.

Yes

ID sylw: 90497

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

agree

Yes

ID sylw: 91179

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

ID sylw: 91673

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

ID sylw: 91769

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

there is no mention of how this support will be given - advice? Finance?

Yes

ID sylw: 92465

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 92582

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Fairburn

I support the desire to see buildings improved to the EnerPHit Passivhaus standard. That said, a true EnerPHit retrofit might add a huge cost to a project where the homeowner is only extending slightly beyond permitted development distances. Perhaps the solution is to require the home to achieve a certain heat-loss improvement overall without the need to achieve the EnerPHit Passivhaus standard 100%.

Yes

ID sylw: 92625

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

No comment

Yes

ID sylw: 92969

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

This clearly has to be part of the plan to reduce energy

Yes

ID sylw: 93137

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray

Totally support these proposals.

Yes

ID sylw: 93187

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley

I fully support Draft Policy Direction 23

Yes

ID sylw: 93246

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting

I agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 23- Reducing Energy Consumption in Existing Buildings

No

ID sylw: 93580

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robin Rumbles

The priority has to be for renewal energy to take precedence over history. It is right to ensure our history is protected but not al the total exclusion of renewals. Local planning officers must become more receptive to allowing renewable energy solution on both historic buildings and those buildings in conservation areas.

The plan should work to better support residents in transferring to renewal energy. I have funded my own solar panels and battery. The cost of installing a air source heat pump owing to having to replace all the radiators and piping (£30,000 has been quoted).

Yes

ID sylw: 93666

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, however the policy should make it explicit that minor changes in appearance for the purposes of energy efficiency are acceptable even in the context of heritage assets and areas. Ideally, specific examples of appropriate retrofitting that would typically be approved (e.g. double glazing replacement with appropriate material windows) should be given.

Yes

ID sylw: 93824

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick District Green Party

-We are pleased to see reference to LETI and Passivhaus, but this policy direction needs to set out clearly when each standard should be required.
-The AECB CarbonLite Retrofit Standard is better for traditional buildings and also considers many more retrofit risks.
-Alternatively, PAS 2035 (for domestic buildings) & Trustmark could be required as it has consumer protection and QA embedded in it. For non domestic buildings, PAS 2038 should be used.
-The policy relies heavily on EPCs for domestic buildings, although this system is due to be replaced.

Yes

ID sylw: 94395

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Waters

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 94797

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Jackson

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 94985

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

no further comment

Other

ID sylw: 95745

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

Cost of retrofitting older buildings is substantial and not always within the means of the owner.

Yes

ID sylw: 95799

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

I agree with this sound and hopefully practical policy.