BASE HEADER

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 23- Reducing Energy Consumption in Existing Buildings?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 31 i 60 o 70

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95939

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes. NOTE there are spelling mistakes in the first line of paragraph 7.5 (it should be alterations, not alternations) and in the third line (it should be conservation not conversation).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96002

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Wherever possible and practical.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96334

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96557

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

(nb: spelling mistake first line of paragraph 7.5, should be alterations not alternations, plus spelling mistake 3rd line, should be conservation not conversation area.)

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96773

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes, Retrofitting should be encouraged and enabled.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96975

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97169

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97350

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Lewin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This should now be what we seek to do everywhere!

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97502

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr HUGH KEEP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is essential for reducing energy requirements in the future.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97792

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no comment

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99285

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As with the other net zero policies for buildings in this consultation, I'm pleased to see reference to LETI and Passivhaus, but this policy direction needs to set out clearly when each standard should be required as if left to the applicant, it will just not happen.
The AECB CarbonLite Retrofit Standard is better for traditional buildings and also considers many more retrofit risks. The STBA Guidance Wheel provides the opportunity to research the interactions between different options of retrofit.
Alternatively, PAS 2035 (for domestic buildings) & Trustmark could be required as it has consumer protection and QA embedded.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99589

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Cocker

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly agree with the approach set out. If it is to be implemented rigorously, it will require substantial changes to Council processes and guides, including training of Officers and Councillors, revisions to design guides, SPDs, etc, including for choice of materials and form factor.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99640

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99842

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford District Council Green Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Please include making it easier for listed buildings. SDC has a bad rep regarding this.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99869

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Welford on Avon Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is an unrealistic ambition without finacial support for residents through grants or loans. The risk here is that old building just stay old and inefficient - people will need support if development to an existing building means that the new and existing infrastructure is to be assessed for compliance to new more onerous energy efficiency standards.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100101

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Excellent policy.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100352

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

NA

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100360

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Parsons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree with the approach laid out

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100520

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Cooper

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This has become an industry setting the rules to justify its existence.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101545

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Zoe Leventhal

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Insulation measures and other retrofit schemes should be supported

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101665

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This development is not good for the area

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101937

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Absolutely critical. The existing housing stock needs radical improvement.

Hopefully this will allow Listed buildings and those within Conservation Areas to make improvements such as sensitively designed double or triple glazing

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102021

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Henderson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It doesn't state a de minimis level that it would apply to therefor I believe it would or could be onerous. Especially if a property is in a conservation area and therefore its permitted development rights are removed so any minor alteration or addition would require a planning application that might therefor be classified as a 'development proposal'.
I have not researched this aspect but I am concerned that it may be an onerous policy on the applicant.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102257

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cole

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Quantification is required here - eg a proposal to drop a kerb or install ramps or handrails to a front door require planning permission. It would be onerous to require a retrospective whole building refit for such de minimis proposals.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102883

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Suggests review and amendment to proposed wording. Clarification on certain elements requested.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102914

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Bailey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103816

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Claire Jones

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support this

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104012

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Mary Manandhar

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Stratford Climate Action submissions apply - please refer

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104072

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Norrie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is a good policy direction. It contains words like sensitive and appropriate, the meaning of which needs to be clarified: ‘The sensitive retrofitting of energy efficiency measures and the appropriate use of micro-renewables in historic buildings will be expected.’ Some kind of guidance or design code, with examples of existing historic buildings with integrated renewables, would be helpful. Perhaps this is intended to be part of the Design Codes mentioned in Chapter 8?

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 104260

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Rachel Pope

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The use of 'where possible' in the draft policy will need careful consideration and explanation to ensure that it is not watered down too much.