Yes

ID sylw: 86070

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 86240

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Brightburn

Is employment land in existing town centres being taken into account too, not just outer settlement car-based locations?

No

ID sylw: 86454

Derbyniwyd: 25/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carole Johnson

There is insufficient public transport in this area which results in a larger number of cars when travelling in rural areas. Trains DO NOT cover many of these proposed areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 86655

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Please ensure that all new employment areas have good public transport (preferably rail) to make them sustainable in a Climate Crisis challenge world.

Yes

ID sylw: 87017

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 87389

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

No

ID sylw: 87571

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I do not agree

Yes

ID sylw: 88155

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

Agree with this approach.

Yes

ID sylw: 88408

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Maurice Stokes

South of the A46 is the east west boundary line which os most suitable for development. Long Marston could be the new Gaydon.

Yes

ID sylw: 88409

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Annette Pharo

The A46 corridor is suitable for development due to the proposed road and rail improvements.

Yes

ID sylw: 88668

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree in principle with Core Opportunity Area for New Employment as its a logical are that fits around existing infrastructure. This latter point, of infrastructure is key for new development as i doubt in some key areas it is most inadequate so clarity on that is required before any new development.

Other

ID sylw: 88759

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 88817

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

I would hope that more joined up safe cycle routes would be provided in this area to encourage cycling to work.

No

ID sylw: 89026

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I see no need for a "core Area" and consider that all policies should be Plan area wide. I think this adds nothing to the plan

Yes

ID sylw: 89397

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

No

ID sylw: 90575

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Terry Simmonds

Rather than providing all the employment in The Core Opportunity Are, incentivize employers to the rural areas to the south of South Warwickshire.

Where The Core Opportunity Area is proposed creates a large area arounf Shipston on Stour where travel out of the area is the only option.

SG17 Should also be treated as a Core Opportunity Area

No

ID sylw: 90618

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick Town Council

Based around the M40, so motorway network, and therefore increasing car travel to a much greater extent than if it focused on locations near public transport. Also excludes those without car access from employment opportunities. Co locating businesses means there’s less housing nearby and further increases car dependency. Core opportunity area should be close to towns and public transport and not include the large rural areas.

No

ID sylw: 90660

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Littlewood

The phrase "the aim of creating capacity on the area's roads" rings alarm bells as most roads int he area are already at capacity. Build new roads and they will get filled to capacity in a very short time.

Yes

ID sylw: 90842

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Malcolm Fisk

I agree

Yes

ID sylw: 91151

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

‘It is recognised that the Core Opportunity Area is the most suitable area for most of the
new employment development but it should also be recognised that within this there are
areas which are not suitable for many types of employment growth and that there are areas
outside the Core Opportunity area which will be suitable for employment growth.’

Yes

ID sylw: 91159

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs liz jackson

c

Yes

ID sylw: 91257

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

ID sylw: 91750

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 91880

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steve Bird

With regards do Wellesbourne preferred growth policy, the potential tie between Warwick university and Wellesbourne airfield is mentioned as a technology and research opportunity for aviation related businesses, which is favourable.
However there is currently a planning application in for a vast site of steel shed warehouses which is completely at odds with the preferred plan. I do hope therefore that the planning application in its current state will be revised and resubmitted in line with the preferred policy

Other

ID sylw: 91965

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

If Wellesbourne is to be included in the COA then significant improvement is needed to public transport and active travel measures. The capacity of A429 also needs to be considered.

Yes

ID sylw: 92119

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: General Aviation Awareness Council and Airfield Operators Group

Wellesbourne Airfield is, quite correctly, identified as a Major Investment Site, taking account of its location, site size which offers development opportunities, its range of services and the opportunity for these to be enhanced.
This innovative, forward looking approach will support the retention of the Airfield and provide significant contributions to the Plan’s economic strategy. The justification for this is clearly set out in the Draft Plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 92376

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 92535

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Fairburn

Please make sure the public transport and active travel parts of this policy direction are strongly emphasised.

No

ID sylw: 92592

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson

Do not agree with any development at all on green belt fir housing or business

Yes

ID sylw: 93887

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley

Public transport routes must serve these new areas and be affordable