Yes

ID sylw: 88213

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Julie Hudson

Overall I really like the scope of ambition in this plan. Warwickshire has a desirable mix of urban and rural considering the challenges to come. It should be possible to achieve social, economic and environmental RESILIENCE through the vision and strategic objectives here.

I think there is an important gap. Missing: resilient food systems. It’s not enough to rely on the large food retailers notwithstanding their effectiveness as a distribution engine in crisis. Food is a food chain: healthy soil, skilled farmers, producers at every scale, and a widely distributed skill base (jobs; nutrition; affordability; accessibility; fairness; culture).

Other

ID sylw: 88216

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree in principle to majority of Objectives but i take issue with the common use of buzz words such as Net Zero, Low Carbon, Sustainability and renewable energies without any substance and clarity within the UK today and whether it is scalable and affordable. Quite a narrow view and confusing one when you ignore the ecological impact from cradle to grave and not just the impact in UK for obtaining the precious resources to drive such a vision. The Vision at high-level is right but the choice of words could be simplified and improved.

No

ID sylw: 88293

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Walsh

We are been robbed of our village. It should be our choice if we want to expand the area in which we live, not the choice of others who do not live here!!! We have a school, a pub, a dentist, a shop, butchers, bakery. That is all. We have to go to the next town for the doctors and a train line. You are planning to stretch what is already so small putting pressure on our schools and services!! Is there no respect for green belt land these days?!

No

ID sylw: 88315

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Hayles

The quality of life for residents in south Warwickshire has been affected adversely by over development. The vast number of new homes built in the towns and villages has caused massive impact on transport. Travel at peak times has become extremely difficult, with long delays and queues affecting everyone. Cycling is not the answer for the elderly or infirm, needing to get from surrounding villages to hospital or GP appointments etc in the towns. Water/sewage pipes in many areas are now not coping with the huge extra demand with frequent poor pressure/pipe bursts causing real problems for residents.

Yes

ID sylw: 88327

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr ROGER CHAPMAN

Summary: I am challenging the assumptions about net inward migration to Warwickshire. People do not need to work here in particular. The continued destruction of the green environment will deter people.
Implementation to-date has been poor.

No

ID sylw: 88414

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Sanders

Incursion onto Green Belt.
Loss of Agricultural and Horticultural land.
Disruption to essential services, gas electricity water sewage.
Loss of rural views.
Increased traffic on rural roads posing danger to pedestrians and cyclists.

Yes

ID sylw: 88423

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr A Patrick

This is all good. But I've seen so many good words later followed by actions that are contrary to the objectives - particularly on transport & environment. Are you going to ensure the detail matches this vision? Given some of the edge of town land allocations it is not looking likely.

No

ID sylw: 88431

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Maurice Stokes

Presenting a document for agreement on population growth through net immigration from the south into the county is not acceptable. Justification arguments are not productive more house building in the south most happen.

Yes

ID sylw: 88471

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Russell

These are all good aims, but, in my experience, the massive new housing developments in Stratford-on-Avon have caused increased traffic jams on the A3400 into Stratford, which only causes more carbon emissions. I am not convinced that increased development will make South Warwickshire more beautiful and sustainable. It is a beautiful area already, so development needs to be gradual and proportionate. Green belt should be protected - higher populations need access to more green areas, not less.

No

ID sylw: 88477

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kiernan

I believe building on green belt land will destroy our countryside and wildlife which is already being developed on also the historical basis the infrastructure can not cope we are already overwhelmed. Climate change also hasn’t been addressed along with transport and employment.

No

ID sylw: 88478

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Kiernan

There’s zero growth strategy regarding employment also building on green belt land the environment will suffer the infrastructure is not there along with transportation.

No

ID sylw: 88479

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Owen Wallis

Progressive development of currently rural land is taking away valuable countryside and leading to further increases in an already overloaded road system

No

ID sylw: 88554

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Allen

There is an over-use of high-level popular themes and 'buzz-words' in many of the objectives which in turn makes specific implementation guidance difficult as almost everything is in play. Objective 4 should have more specific links to the other government initiatives to grow the economy and jobs in specific sectors. Objective 12 speaks to leveraging what already exists and references 'green space'. It should not shy away from mentioning the Green Belt specifically which has been in effect for ~50 years now. 50 years of consistent policy implementation and hard-fought protection provides a great foundation / heritage to build upon.

Yes

ID sylw: 88582

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Jill Thurston

Transport through the town of Warwick is a nightmare. It is chaos at peak times

Yes

ID sylw: 88605

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

There are several empty/derelict properties in the area, these should be developed for housing primarily not tourism. The current level of tourism overloads the road and other infrastructure. Traffic flow around Stratford and sewage problems are examples of the overloaded infrastructure. No green space should be used for new developments until all brownfield sites are repurposed.

Yes

ID sylw: 88654

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Middleton

No comment

Other

ID sylw: 88676

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Crispin Passmore

You do not put economic growth at the heart of delivering the vision - without that it will amount to nothing and is just fanciful political speak and dreaming. We have to fund beauty, health, sustainability, recreation, education etc and that comes from creating an economy that is growing, increasing productivity and harnessing the economic power of all citizens so that they can play a meaningful part in civil society. Growth is core to everything else in the plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 88695

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Durk

It's hard to object to any of this, other than perhaps the need for growth. I would like to ensure that strategic objective 12 is given the maximum possible weighting, and it's not obvious that this is compatible with taking land out of the green belt

Yes

ID sylw: 88912

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Currie

An efficient and reliable Public transport system must be provided in order to get people away from ignition combustion engine vehicles. The public transport must enable efficient connectivity of all transport forms: walking, scooter, cycle, rail.
Commercial transport is currently dependent upon ignition vehicle engines and it is unlikely that there will be alternatives to achieve the zero emissions required by 2050 or beyond. Therefore, an electro rail / road system needs to be investigated and implemented.

Yes

ID sylw: 88952

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Nigel Rock

3.2 support the Strategic Objectives

Yes

ID sylw: 88976

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

In housing priority should be given to accommodating local needs - particularly that evidenced by up to date housing surveys

Other

ID sylw: 88995

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association

1) As "Growth" is fortuitously mentioned first must we assume that the Objectives are in descending order of importance? If not, what relative weight will be given to them - if there is a conflict between two or more?
2) Re the need for sustainability why is there no mention of rail in Objective 3 or statement that further development of the existing lines would be desirable? The line via Henley and the main line south through Warwick could be extended to Long Marston and beyond and there is an existing spur to Kineton/Gaydon with good access north and south.

Other

ID sylw: 89186

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Wendy Bannerman

SO3 - equestrians should be included in new paths for safety and equality
SO9 - equestrian tourism is thriving where off-road access is good
SO10 - equestrian activity contributes to health and wellbeing statistics
SO11 - access should be inclusive of equestrians
SO12 - planting should consider maintenance liability and avoid encroachment on the width and height of shared paths.

Yes

ID sylw: 89366

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

The strategic objectives are admirable and I support them. I do have concern over how these objectives will be balanced against viability, practical, and other pressures arising from quantity of houses and developer incentives.

Yes

ID sylw: 89389

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

Yes

ID sylw: 89425

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

Broadly supportive - new settlements require infrastructure and phasing of developments to ensure this important - climate change and wider environmental concerns must be considered - any new settlement without a viable rail link should be ruled out due to climate change and environmental considerations as would generate further road traffic.

Yes

ID sylw: 89485

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comments

No

ID sylw: 89504

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Mylene Reilly

For these plans to work WCC need to address the disgraceful state of the roads around Warwickshire and in particular to Leamington spa and most certainly in Whitnash before building more houses that no doubt will have cars !!

Yes

ID sylw: 89629

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Lucy Bonsall

NA

Yes

ID sylw: 89721

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a