BASE HEADER
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91485
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Beth Palmer
I feel Stratford upon Avon and district have more than met their quota for housing provision however this has not led to any improvement in any of the areas listed above in fact it appears to have had a detrimental effect
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91653
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor
I think its unfair for you to ask me to comment and then ask for a summary. this process is already long and stressful.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91734
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms miranda maloney
No. 9 How can we keep heritage when places like Mary Ardens farm will no longer exist due to over development of land around it?
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91810
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Jodie Keith
Objective 3: infrastructure enhancements should be prioritised before additional housing is built. The wording should be strengthened to reflect this as previous experience has shown housing development prioritised before necessary infrastructure to support the new houses. Current services are already beyond capacity e.g Warwick hospital, school intakes and GP wait lists.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91833
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Shakespeare Line Rail User Group
Asiant : Mr Terry Phillips
We fully support the Vision and Strategic Objectives, with the understanding that housing development must attract effective investment in key infrastructure. The Local Planning Authority and its elected members will need to ensure this, as anything less will undermine the SWLP's Vision and Strategic Objectives.
It is imperative that a significant modal shift in transportation takes place. This necessitates a change in approach by the Local Transport Authority, where roads are not the preferred or exclusive solution.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91870
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Harbury Parish Council
We broadly support the strategic objectives, but would note that objective 3 has tended not to be the case in the past, with houses being built first, and most infrastructure (eg medical facilities) following behind, and in some case (better public transport) not happening at all.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91873
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson
Do not support
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91874
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson
Do not support
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91876
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson
Do not support
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92068
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ted and Zbigniew Jasinski
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92100
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs cynthia bettany
it all sounds wonderful, but I can't see it happening when big swaths of green space are being considered for development. Current settlement areas being built at the moment have no character, too much sameness with no thought to building a community. Crime is rife, even in the countryside, an impossible task for our under staffed police force. Warehousing and industrial units are often large and unattractive.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92105
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: General Aviation Awareness Council and Airfield Operators Group
The Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92111
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Vincent
the devil will be in the details!
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92139
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: T Cullum
I support the principles and strategic objectives with the below notes on objectives:
5. Bidford has an unused derelict building screaming out to be developed.
6. All new development should have renewable energy generation.
7. Already a policy but, regrettably, not enforced.
9. Must be done sympathetically and taking into account Objective 8
11. Need better and more reliable public transport. Buses should run later and be more frequent at peak times. They are worse at weekends. More services for rural settlements. Need better and safer cycling and pedestrian routes.
12. Consider this for the pockets of land around SG20.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92148
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown
N/A
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92169
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Wilson
The Vision and Objectives seem purely aspirational and naive. The expectation that all this will be achieved without problematic destruction of the landscape and reduction in agricultural land is grossly misguided. Thus any pretence that Warwickshire will be protected from being vastly suburbanised rather than enriching it for living or tourism.
Equally naive is the expectation that the infrastructure will meet the needs of the housing expansion.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92195
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Sara Burney
The proposal to build thousands of houses around South Warwickshire flies in the face of the Strategic Objectives set out above. You cannot say you're enriching tourism (9), maintaining attractive places (7), protecting heritage (etc) (8), and protecting and enhancing environmental assets (12) when you're proposing the creation of enormous housing estates on the greenbelt. This is not an effective use of land and natural resources (5). We also don't have the infrastructure (3) to cope with tens of thousands of new homes, which means these are not sustainable levels of growth (1). Development must be dispersed, not clustered.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92197
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr William Bache
n/a
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92206
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Rebecca Johnson
n/a
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92273
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: SolStar Power Limited
Asiant : Enzygo
SolStar Power consider the new Local Plan Strategic Objectives have been strengthened from the adopted plan, to include the commitment to become a net zero carbon area. Further comments are provided in the attached letter (SHF.3100.001).
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92386
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Stuart Alford
The objectives at a high level here seem sensible
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92503
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Fairburn
Objective 3 includes ‘roads’ as required infrastructure. The council must consider the well-evidenced effect of Induced Traffic, when roads are built. New roads should prioritise bus and cycle lanes.
Objective 6. New developments be required to feature homes which have broadly south facing roofs wherever possible. The DNO should be required to provide connections which can accommodate exporting of power assuming all homes will have large solar arrays eventually.
Objective 8 - respect the local character– could stop homeowners putting external insulation on walls or installing solar panels. Such additions should be aesthetically pleasing, but they should be allowed.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92540
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson
Do not agree or support these proposals
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92547
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr David Carr
As above
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92572
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: The Planning Bureau Ltd
To help meet the 'critical' need for Older Persons' Housing we propose adding the following wording to Strategic Objective 2: ... to meet the diverse need of our residents, including specialist (including housing suitable for older people such as retirement housing, housing with-care and care homes)
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92709
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Williams
Of course one must agree with the positive slant placed on many of these objectives, but it is difficult to reconcile objectives 5, 7, 8, 10 & 12 with the plan to create a huge conurbation south of Warwick and Leamington, from Barford in the west to Witnash in the east. The objectives simply contradict each other and are therefore meaningless.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92719
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Hopkinson
Strategic objective 5 states ,Making effective use of land and natural resources'. In reality you are taking land out of productive agricultural use. In our cities on the other hand there are large areas of wasteland which could be used for Affordable housing without damaging amenities. In fact improving the neighbouhoods. One hour's drive round Birmingham just outside the Ring threw up the attached 13 sites. These are where the affordable housing should be.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92730
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Hopkinson
Objective 2: Delivering homes that meet the needs of all our communities. Please note that the peole who come and live in your new homes, say B1 or SG07 will not be Warwickshire people. They will be people who come from Birmingham. As you can see from the attached photos there is lots of room for development in Birmingham, where they would have much better job opportunites and better transport infrastructure. Stuck our in Warwickshire: will they really be happy?
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92742
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce
Strategic Objective 1: Well designed and beautiful should promote wellbeing. Omitted from the list of examples that make up is access to open countryside which is a feature of South Warwickshire's current appeal.. The priority for homes should be sustainable AND affordable and a recognition that an increase in housing density will be inevitable. The stimulation of investment for higher paid employment will be an essential element in achieving the balance of outstanding design, beauty, sustainability and easy access to the countryside.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92789
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham
Yes I broadly support these.