Sustainable Buildings SPD
Search representations
Results for Kenilworth Town Council search
New search
New search
Sustainable Buildings SPD
Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council
Representation Summary:
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Full text:
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
Sustainable Buildings SPD
Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council
Representation Summary:
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
Full text:
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
Sustainable Buildings SPD
Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council
Representation Summary:
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
Full text:
Objects to the contradiction between sections 4 and 5 with regard to new development and home extensions. There is concern that some developers may try to thwart the objectives while domestic extensions may be unreasonably denied particularly in older un insulated properties where using latest building regulations without applying renewables could acheive a greater energy saving.
Paragraph 8.4 should reflect the latest mandate that only permeable surfaces to domestic driveways shall be allowed.
It is questioned whether the renewable toolkits are representative. Do they consider acquisition in terms of carbon costs and whole life costs (reliability / maintainability) that would contribute to future carbon footprint through spares. Does the toolkit compare the relative merits of different types of renewable energy sources.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.