Sustainable Buildings SPD
Search representations
Results for Warwick Castle search
New searchComment
Sustainable Buildings SPD
1: Introduction
Representation ID: 72
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Warwick Castle
Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners
Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.
Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.
The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.
Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.
Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.
Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment
Object
Sustainable Buildings SPD
3: Meeting the Requirement
Representation ID: 73
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Warwick Castle
Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners
The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and a uniform approach should not be adopted.
Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.
The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.
Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.
Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.
Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment
Support
Sustainable Buildings SPD
4: The 10% Requirement
Representation ID: 74
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Warwick Castle
Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners
Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.
Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.
The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.
Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.
Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.
Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment
Support
Sustainable Buildings SPD
4.4
Representation ID: 75
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Warwick Castle
Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners
Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.
Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.
The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.
Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.
Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.
Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment
Support
Sustainable Buildings SPD
7.11
Representation ID: 76
Received: 10/10/2008
Respondent: Warwick Castle
Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners
Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment
Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.
The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.
Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.
Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.
Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment