Sustainable Buildings SPD

Search representations

Results for Warwick Castle search

New search New search

Comment

Sustainable Buildings SPD

1: Introduction

Representation ID: 72

Received: 10/10/2008

Respondent: Warwick Castle

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners

Representation Summary:

Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.

Full text:

Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.

The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.

Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.

Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.

Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment

Object

Sustainable Buildings SPD

3: Meeting the Requirement

Representation ID: 73

Received: 10/10/2008

Respondent: Warwick Castle

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners

Representation Summary:

The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and a uniform approach should not be adopted.

Full text:

Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.

The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.

Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.

Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.

Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment

Support

Sustainable Buildings SPD

4: The 10% Requirement

Representation ID: 74

Received: 10/10/2008

Respondent: Warwick Castle

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners

Representation Summary:

Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.


Full text:

Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.

The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.

Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.

Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.

Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment

Support

Sustainable Buildings SPD

4.4

Representation ID: 75

Received: 10/10/2008

Respondent: Warwick Castle

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners

Representation Summary:

Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.


Full text:

Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.

The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.

Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.

Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.

Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment

Support

Sustainable Buildings SPD

7.11

Representation ID: 76

Received: 10/10/2008

Respondent: Warwick Castle

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners

Representation Summary:

Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment

Full text:

Supports sustainable development and construction techniques as an important principle for the district and recognises the significance and wider implications of a commitment to reducing climate change through the planning system.

The submission of an Energy Statement should not be necessary for all planning applications and the format of each statement may vary as not all categories in paragraph 3.2 will be attainable. A uniform approach should not be adopted as the submission and format of the statement should be dependant on the scale and nature of the proposal.

Welcome the recognition that meeting the 10% requirement may not be appropriate for all developments.

Support the inclusion of para 4.4 which identifies the potential conflict between the provision of renewable technology and the preservation of the historic environment.

Supports the recognition that the installation of renewables can detract from the historic integrity of the building but appreciates that with careful consideration some installations may be appropriate with the historic environment

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.