Publication Draft

Object

Representation ID: 65715

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Centaur Homes object to Policy DS2 in entirety. It is not required as the aims of the policy are within the Framework and the policy does not deviate or go beyond these.

Object

Representation ID: 65871

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This policy is unnecessary as the presumption is set out in the Framework and this is relevant to all decision taking.

Support

Representation ID: 65872

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Centaur Homes support parts b, d, f and g of this policy. Part g supports paragraph 83 of the Framework through only altering the green belt
in exceptional circumstances. It is considered that the need to produce a new Local Plan for the next plan period qualifies as very special circumstances to warrant a review of the green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 65873

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Centaur Homes object to the level of housing growth put forward in the Plan. This
objection is based on the fact that whilst the objectively assessed need for the
District is broadly in the region of 13,000, the Plan has been prepared in isolation and does not take into account the need for the District to accommodate the needs of adjacent authorities, such as Coventry, as part of the Duty to Co-operate set out in the Framework.

Object

Representation ID: 65875

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Centaur Homes object to the excessive number of units within the windfall allowance and the separate inclusion of SHLAA sites. Paragraph 48 of the Framework states that any allowance for windfall sites should be realistic having regard to the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment, historic windfall delivery and any future trends. The production of the Local Plan is the opportune time to proactively plan for new development rather than leaving it to windfall and
speculative sites being brought forward

Support

Representation ID: 65876

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Centaur Homes support the strategy of allocating sites in the most sustainable towns and villages. Hampton Magna has been identified as a Growth Village and
development here will provide an opportunity to rebalance the local housing market and provide much needed affordable housing and local market for local residents. In light of other representations, further additional development should be directed to the village to meet the aims and objectives of paragraph 55 of the Framework.

Object

Representation ID: 65877

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Object to this policy,in particular the allocated sites as follows primarily on the grounds of size and suitability:-
- H20 Barford Land south of Barford House.
- H24 Burton Green Burrow Hill Nursery
- H27 Hampton Magna south of Arras Boulevard
- H29 Kingswood Meadow House
- H31 South of the Stables
- H33 Kingswood West off Mill Lane
- H34,H35 & H36 Leek Wootton - should be one allocation
- H37 Car Park East of Hayes
- H27 Hampton Magna South of Arras Boulevard will contribute to coalescence of Hampton Magna with Warwick.

Object

Representation ID: 65878

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Centaur Homes object to the inclusion of this policy within the Local Plan. It goes
against paragraph 153 of the Framework that states that any additional development plan documents should be clearly justified.The requirement for an additional DPD has not been fully justified within the Local Plan

Object

Representation ID: 65879

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This policy restates national policy and does not provide any further information and as the Framework is a material consideration in the decision taking process this document should already be referred to without the need for this policy to explicitly state it.Therefore, it does not accord with paragraph 154 of the Framework

Object

Representation ID: 65880

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: Centaur Homes

Agent: McLoughlin Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Centaur Homes object to the wording of the policy. This goes against paragraphs 178 to 182 of the Framework, including the duty to cooperate and the Local Plan being positively prepared. It also does not support paragraphs 47 and 49 of the Framework as any unmet need should form part of the objectively assessed need and if it cannot be demonstrated that enough land is available to meet this need then paragraph 49 applies.