Publication Draft

Object

Representation ID: 65679

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: The Rosconn Group

Agent: Miss Donna Savage

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The policy is too restrictive. By restricting new development, the opportunity will be missed to allow villages and their services to remain viable. Without a critical mass, local bus and rail services will be at risk of closure or cuts to services.

Object

Representation ID: 66737

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: The Rosconn Group

Agent: Miss Donna Savage

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Objects to the omission of Hatton Station as a Growth Village. Hatton Station has a railway station which offers an alternative means of transport but has been overlooked for development whereas villages with no choice of transportation but having a couple of shops have been given greater weight.

Object

Representation ID: 66739

Received: 27/06/2014

Respondent: The Rosconn Group

Agent: Miss Donna Savage

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Objector disputes the Village Sites Appraisal Matrix with specific reference to sites in Cubbington. The allotment land and adjacent Riding School (sites 3 & 4 in Village Housing Options Consultation) have been disregarded on the basis of access and landscape but additional information has been submitted on both issues and it has been demonstrated that access can be achieved.

Sites 3 & 4 are preferable to the allocated sites in Cubbington by way of being better screened and not including any development on open Green Belt land. Further, the allotments would be improved and converted to statutory allotments for the benefit of the community