Gypsy and Traveller Site Options

Object

Representation ID: 57153

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Westham House Ltd

Westham Lane is a private road so would need a CPO and widening, which will have adverse visual impact.
CPO would be required for the farmer's land as he does not wish to sell it.
Water voles, a protect species, are on the site.
Bronze Age burial site have been discovered in the vicinity.
Access on to the Bypass would be dangerous and there are no pedestrian crossing points for access to the village.
Site has no mains gas or sewage facilities.
Site is at medium risk of flooding.
No GP in the village.
Will create an eyesore. Difficult to mitigate visual impact of such a development.
This is development outside the village envelope - is it double standards given difficulty existing residents have developing sites/extending properties?
Will create noise and disturbance for Westham House and decimate the business.
This development would contradict Rural Area Policies on new housing, employment, safeguarding rural roads, camping and caravan sites.
Integration and co-existence seems unlikely.

Object

Representation ID: 57325

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Westham House Ltd

Access onto the A429 is dangerous.
No pedestrian crossing facilities to get to the village.
Seems contradictory given difficulty existing residents have had extending properties to then allocate this site in Westham Lane.
Noise and disturbance from the site would impact upon Westham House and is likely to decimate the business and impact on the local economy.
Westham Lane is a private road so would need a CPO and widening, which will have adverse visual impact.
Will result in loss of Grade 2 farmland. CPO would be required for the farmer's land as he does not wish to sell it.
Water voles, a protect species, are on the site.
Bronze Age burial site have been discovered in the vicinity.
Seems unlikely that the site will promote integration and peaceful co-existence.
No storm/foul sewers or mains gas.
Site is at medium risk of flooding.
No GP in the village.
Given surrounding flat land it will be difficult to mitigate visual impact of such a development.
This is development outside the village envelope - is it double standards given difficulty existing residents have developing sites/extending properties?
This development would contradict Rural Area Policies on new housing, employment, safeguarding rural roads, camping and caravan sites.

Comment

Representation ID: 60034

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Westham House Ltd

Should use brownfield sites and/or be integrated into new developments in Warwick, Leamington and Kenilworth. the latter option would provide the necessary facilities for residents and make integration easier.

Comment

Representation ID: 60143

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Westham House Ltd

Should use brownfield sites.
Integrated into new developments in Warwick, Leamington and Kenilworth. Would provide the necessary facilities and make integration easier.
Former Council tip (WDC owned land) on Fosse Way would be within easy reach of Leamington and its facilities.