Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Search representations
Results for Ocean Power Technologies Limited search
New searchObject
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
GT03 Land at Barnwell Farm
Representation ID: 55974
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Ocean Power Technologies Limited
Why allocate this site for people without a local connection or pressing need when there is existing demand from locals for low cost housing and housing for elderly residents?
Removing an existing business by compulsory purchase is inappropriate.
This is a very busy road. Further entrances and traffic is likely to increase the number of accidents.
Harbury School is at capacity and other local schools are at near capacity. Who will fund the additional costs of getting these children to school?
Object to development of the green belt.
Development will damage wildlife habitats and have an adverse visual impact on the village.
Will site occupants have their rates and utility bills subsidised?
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
GT04 Land at Harbury Lane, Fosse Way
Representation ID: 55977
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Ocean Power Technologies Limited
Number of people: 2
Why allocate this site for people without a local connection or pressing need when there is existing demand from locals for low cost housing and housing for elderly residents?
Removing an existing business by compulsory purchase is inappropriate.
This is a very busy road. Further entrances and traffic is likely to increase the number of accidents.
Harbury School is at capacity and other local schools are at near capacity. Who will fund the additional costs of getting these children to school?
Object to development of the green belt.
Development will damage wildlife habitats and have an adverse visual impact on the village.
Will site occupants have their rates and utility bills subsidised?
see attached
Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
1. Introduction
Representation ID: 55980
Received: 29/07/2013
Respondent: Ocean Power Technologies Limited
Inhabitants of Harbury only became aware of the proposals at a late stage, which calls into question how the consultation process has been handled.
Which sites were photographed for the Gypsy and Travellers Site Options document as they look nothing like other travellers sites?
see attached
