Revised Development Strategy

Search representations

Results for Commercial Estates Group search

New search New search

Object

Revised Development Strategy

RDS1: The Council is adopting an Interim Level of Growth of 12,300 homes between 2011 and 2029

Representation ID: 55432

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Representation Summary:

Object on the basis that it is not appropriate to produce an interim housing figure. The housing requirement should be based on up to date evidence. Aware this is being prepared and the local plan preparation should await the findings of the housing study.

Full text:

see attached

Object

Revised Development Strategy

RDS3: The Council's Preferred Option for the broad location of development is to:

Representation ID: 56549

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Representation Summary:

Object on basis that the identification of the location of housing development is not -based on the correct approach required by the NPPF. The correct approach to Green -Belt review and sustainability would result in fewer housing units being identified on -greenfield land to the south of Warwick. Instead, land at Blackdown, to the north of -Leamington, would be identified as a broad location for some of the housing required -in the district.

Full text:

see attached

Object

Revised Development Strategy

RDS5: The following sites will be allocated for development:

Representation ID: 56550

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Representation Summary:

Object for reasons outlined under objection to RDS1 and RDS3

Full text:

see attached

Object

Revised Development Strategy

5.6 District Wide Transport Mitigation Proposals

Representation ID: 56551

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Representation Summary:

The extensive highway mitigation works referred to, and the costs associated with this, would not be required if the distribution of development was rebalanced, as
outlined above.

Full text:

see attached

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.