Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for Burton Green Parish Council search

New search New search

Support

Preferred Options

Burton Green

Representation ID: 48445

Received: 30/07/2012

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Supports the allocation of the village as a category 2 village and acknowledges that because of HS2 the number of houses likely to be developed will be on the higher end of 30-80. Would like to see the inclusion of a replacement village hall within any proposals (allowing for the potential loss of the current village hall through HS2). Suggests that proposals should not be brought forward or confirmed until after the final design and mitigation for HS2 through the village is confirmed.

Full text:

Burton Green Parish Council:
> supports the allocation of the village as a category 2 development village
> recognises that because of the number of homes potentially to be lost because of HS2 that the numbers of houses to be developed in the village are likely to be on the higher end of the development numbers of 30-80
> supports the peri-urban park proposal
> looks forward to working with the District Council to bring forward suggested sites for development
> would like to see the inclusion of a replacement village hall within any proposals (allowing for the potential loss of the current village hall through HS2 development)
> suggests that any development should or proposals should not be brought forward or confirmed until after the final design and mitigation for HS2 through the village is confirmed.

Support

Preferred Options

District Wide Strategic Green Infrastructure

Representation ID: 48447

Received: 30/07/2012

Respondent: Burton Green Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Supports the peri-urban park proposal

Full text:

Burton Green Parish Council:
> supports the allocation of the village as a category 2 development village
> recognises that because of the number of homes potentially to be lost because of HS2 that the numbers of houses to be developed in the village are likely to be on the higher end of the development numbers of 30-80
> supports the peri-urban park proposal
> looks forward to working with the District Council to bring forward suggested sites for development
> would like to see the inclusion of a replacement village hall within any proposals (allowing for the potential loss of the current village hall through HS2 development)
> suggests that any development should or proposals should not be brought forward or confirmed until after the final design and mitigation for HS2 through the village is confirmed.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.