Helping Shape the District

Search representations

Results for Kenilworth Town Council search

New search New search

Comment

Helping Shape the District

What are the scenarios?

Representation ID: 46186

Received: 07/07/2011

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Representation Summary:

In considering need, this should be based on what is needed by the community for the District, not what is required by developers. The need for development should have robust plans for infrastructure, so they can complement existing communities. The need must also be phased using land available for development first, before releasing any greenfield land or green belt land.

Full text:

In considering need, this should be based on what is needed by the community for the District, not what is required by developers. The need for development should have robust plans for infrastructure, so they can complement existing communities. The need must also be phased using land available for development first, before releasing any greenfield land or green belt land.

Comment

Helping Shape the District

2 - Housing

Representation ID: 46192

Received: 11/07/2011

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Representation Summary:

The Council must consider and make provision for the needs of the community for housing and employment. Any plans or proposals should be sustainable and include provision for infrastructure and clear proposals for how any new development will connect with, and complement, the existing community.


Green Belt land should not be released before the development of any land with permission or available for development.. Further, any land allocations in the Green belt should be should be developed in the final phases of the Plan.

The Town Council is opposed to any development of land at Thickthorn for reasons related to loss of Green belt; pressures on existing infrastructure; the past high levels of development in the town over the last 60 years and the loss of the rugby club and, potentially, the cricket club.

If land in adjacent to Kenilworth is allocated, it should not be developed prior to approved or available land outside the Green Belt and the development should include a full range of infrastructure requirements appropriate to its size.

HS2 will have a detrimental effect on the local economy and the quality of the environment/ Green Belt.

Full text:

The Council must consider and make provision for the needs of the community for housing and employment. Any plans or proposals should be sustainable and include provision for infrastructure and clear proposals for how any new development will connect with, and complement, the existing community.

Green Belt land should not be released before the development of any land with permission or available for development.. Further, any land allocations in the Green belt should be should be developed in the final phases of the Plan.

The Town Council is opposed to any development of land at Thickthorn for reasons related to loss of Green belt; pressures on existing infrastructure; the past high levels of development in the town over the last 60 years and the loss of the rugby club and, potentially, the cricket club.

If land in adjacent to Kenilworth is allocated, it should not be developed prior to approved or available land outside the Green Belt and the development should include a full range of infrastructure requirements appropriate to its size.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.