Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council search
New searchObject
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Representation ID: 2929
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
This council believes that Hatton Park, Bagington and Burton Green should be included to assist in spreading the load of development over a wider area and also in the case of Hatton Park to significantly increase viability, vitality and sustainability of that settlement, especially when it already benefits from good communication infrastructure in terms of access to the motorway network and Warwick Parkway railway station.
Furthermore consideration and provision should be made for potential use of Bagington airport should that site become available - NB: Source of minerals and development?
Support
Publication Draft
(i) Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington
Representation ID: 2930
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
(ii) Land at Station Approach, Leamington
Representation ID: 2931
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
(iii) Land at Warwickshire College, Leamington
Representation ID: 2932
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
(iv) Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash
Representation ID: 2933
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
(v) Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane, Whitnash
Representation ID: 2934
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
(vi) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Representation ID: 2935
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
This should be most strenuously resisted.
* Loss of valuable agricultural land
* Excessive creeping towards Bishops Tachbrook , eroding the buffer zone/area of restraint
* Too demanding of new infrastructure implementation
* All existing infrastructure is north of river with limited crossing possibilities
* Significant impact on communications into/through Warwick/Leamington
Support
Publication Draft
(vii) Land west of Europa Way, Warwick
Representation ID: 2936
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Better placed for access to infrastructure but only acceptable as part of a scheme to spread development more widely than concentrating the majority south of Warwick/Leamington.
Support
Publication Draft
(viii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth
Representation ID: 2937
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Comment
Publication Draft
(ix) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham
Representation ID: 2938
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support for accomodating WDC allocation, Object if proposed to support Coventry allocation/overspill.
