Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice] search
New searchObject
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
Representation ID: 33607
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
The site of the former North Leamington School will make no contribution towards meeting employment land needs as the area is not attractive or suitable for employment uses.
The site of the former North Leamington School should no longer be counted as an existing employment commitment; that it should be able to be redeveloped for residential, or for other appropriate use, and that the current policy presumption favouring employment redevelopment should be deleted.
As a residential opportunity, the site is fully deliverable, available, suitable and achievable.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Town Centres?
Representation ID: 33608
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
The adoption of a hierarchy in accordance with the RSS is considered to be the most appropriate action and will enable distinct but complementary strategies to be devised that can provide for appropriate growth whilst maintaining the individual characters of the towns.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the preferred hierarchy and strategy for each of the District's town and local centres?
Representation ID: 33609
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Regeneration?
Representation ID: 33610
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Regeneration?
Representation ID: 33611
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?
Representation ID: 33612
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?
Representation ID: 33613
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Rural Communities, particularly in respect of rural housing?
Representation ID: 33614
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support a framework for considering proposals for new development within villages as opposed to identifying specific requirements. However, there is a recognised local resistance to new developments in both villages and the countryside and those in most need of housing often lose out to organised minorities objecting to development.
More guidance should be given to how the Council will assess proposals for new development in the villages and countryside. Recognition should be given to the unique nature of urban fringe locations. Strategies must be flexible enough to allow for reasonable development in locations deemed acceptable.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Representation ID: 33615
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Object as the former North Leamington School site has not been allocated as a site suitable for housing development.
The site would result in the redevelopment of brownfield land and make use of a vacant site. It adjoins the urban area. It would be more appropriate than an employment use, would be compatible with adjoining uses, would add to the portfolio of sites. There is no demand for employment uses. Benefits would accrue to the visual appearance of the Green belt. It accords with national policy.
Comment
Publication Draft
(ix) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham
Representation ID: 33616
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
The potential use of Green Belt to meet housing needs from outside the District.
