Publication Draft

Support

Representation ID: 6974

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Chamber of Trade

KCOT suggest the Nathaniel Lichfield estimates over state the likely case of housing land need

Object

Representation ID: 6975

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Chamber of Trade

Development at Thickthorn, would require additional infrastructure works.

New in/out access direct from Thickthorn island should be created to provide access into the development land at Thickthorn for both commercial/business and residential.

The road should then link through to Glasshouse Lane somewhere near the existing Rugby Club entrance or Rocky Lane. Glasshouse lane could then be downgraded between this new junction and Leamington Road. This would facilitate easier pedestrian and cycle way movements from the new business park up into the town centre, to help sustain services.

Vital that pedestrian/cycle access to the train station is also in place.

Support

Representation ID: 6976

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Chamber of Trade

CIL [or S106] provides a mechanism for local authorities to secure funding for public works as part of granting planning consent for new development. The key - this was one of the failings under S106 was the inconsistency of interpretation of the rules. It is also vital to have a clear vision in place though a detailed development brief so that it is transparent from the outset what is going to be required from developers. Any money generated should be ring fenced to the location from which it arises.

Support

Representation ID: 6977

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Chamber of Trade

Heritage is a significant asset in the area and should be nurtured because of the tourism spend in a town that can be generated.