Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Guide Dogs for the Blind Association search
New searchSupport
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Tourism?
Representation ID: 1363
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Yes
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Tourism, particularly in respect of visitor accommodation?
Representation ID: 1364
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Regeneration?
Representation ID: 1365
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Support - yes
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Regeneration?
Representation ID: 1366
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?
Representation ID: 1367
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Yes
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Rural Communities, particularly in respect of rural housing?
Representation ID: 1368
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Representation ID: 1369
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
The Council may find that a lot of sites with p/p will not be developed or planning permission will lapse because of the credit crunch/recession.
At the present time, developers are not building new homes because of the recession and this has a knock-on effect for the Council's housing completion figures.
We notice that the Council have allowed for a 2.5% slippage of houses not being built or p/p lapsing but because of the credit crunch we feel this is a too conservative estimate. We feel this is more likely to be 10%.
Object
Publication Draft
(i) Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington
Representation ID: 1370
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
It is questioned why this site has been included in the Preferred Options at all. At a yield of 75 dwellings in total this is not considered to be a site of strategic importance. It is considered that there are just as many sites of equal size that fall within the council's 'Amber Sites' category. So the question is why the Former Foundry site has an elevated status to that of a strategic site over the others in the SHLAA.
Object
Publication Draft
(vi) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Representation ID: 1375
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
This is a large Greenfield site that should not be developed. Other previously developed sites in more sustainable locations close to Leamington Town Centre should be given preference in favour of these type of sites which result in urban sprawl into the countryside
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
Representation ID: 1380
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association
Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants
Yes, this approach is supported.
