Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for The Coal Authority search
New searchComment
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
Representation ID: 884
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: The Coal Authority
The CA has no preference for any of the options.It is noted that there are proposals for expanding Warwick University and that these will contribute towards the employment land supply within the District
The CS should make reference for the need to obtain information on the mining position/ground conditions and incorporate any mitigation measures that may be required as part of the development process
Land instability/mining legacy need not prevent development and that development can offer an opportunity to treat any existing hazards to the benefit of local communities/interests of overall sustainability/public safety
To comply with national guidance as set out in PPG14
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?
Representation ID: 888
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: The Coal Authority
If higher levels of growth are imposed following the RSS examination,this may necessitate the further consideration of housing development on sites which have been excluded from the PO.In the event that it becomes necessary to consider housing development within the deep coal resource area the mining position of any potential development sites would need to be given due consideration in order that any stability/public safety issues are identified and addressed.This would be particularly relevant if the currently excluded SHLAA sites in the Burton Green area were to be re-considered for development as a result of any increase in housing requirement
