Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Norton Lindsey Parish Council search
New searchSupport
Publication Draft
(iv) Land south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash
Representation ID: 6999
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported
Support
Publication Draft
(v) Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane, Whitnash
Representation ID: 7000
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported
Support
Publication Draft
(vi) Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Representation ID: 7001
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Qualified Suuport but concerned at the dense housing in the area without investment in amenities
Support
Publication Draft
(vii) Land west of Europa Way, Warwick
Representation ID: 7002
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported but concerned at the loss of a 'Green lung' to this area
Support
Publication Draft
(viii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth
Representation ID: 7003
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported but concerned at the loss of a 'Green lung' to this area
Comment
Publication Draft
(ix) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham
Representation ID: 7004
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported but concerned that it is possibly necessary because Coventry are not using their Brownfield sites
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
Representation ID: 7005
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported but would have to be carefully managed
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Representation ID: 7006
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
The proposals are draconian in concept and does not lead to workable solutions which satisfy acceptable criteria. The larger sites could possibly accommodate such guidelines but smaller sites would require much more research taking account of local need.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
Representation ID: 7007
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Unfortunately yes but careful design will be needed, to enable amenities and green areas for recreation to be incorporated.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?
Representation ID: 7008
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Past experience has shown that so called experts do not taken account of the financial, human, amenity, and social issues of accelerated development. The recent developments in the District have not yet shaken down nor has the amenities and infrastructure caught up. Strongly against.
