Preferred Options 2025

Search representations

Results for Wareing and Company search

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 101188

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Wareing and Company

Representation Summary:

I do not agree that SG06 should be allocated for residential development.

The local housing need can be met without developing green belt land,SG06 is not a sustainable location,this land is high quality agricultural land, the same proposals have been rejected by the planning inspector in 2017,we need to retain the biodiversity and access to nature so close to the urban environment.

Allocating this site will set a precedent to undermine retaining a separation between North Leamington and Kenilworth

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.