Preferred Options 2025

No

Representation ID: 92174

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

It makes no sense to disrupt the beautiful wildlife in these rural areas. Its a beautiful village and will completely change the whole atmosphere of a rural village vibe. The hospital simply cannot accommodate the people in south Warwickshire as it is let alone another 8000 houses worth of people. The schools are already at maximum capacity and the traffic around south Warwickshire is already horrendous. The whole idea is totally unrealistic.

Yes

Representation ID: 104171

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

We support the strategic direction in the draft plan and can confirm that this broadly aligns with SWFT strategy, with a strong focus on prevention, sustainability and connected, inclusive communities.

No

Representation ID: 104184

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development includes woodland areas and is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

Representation ID: 104191

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

Representation ID: 104196

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

Representation ID: 104200

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

Representation ID: 104206

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

Other

Representation ID: 104208

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.

Other

Representation ID: 104210

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.

No

Representation ID: 104217

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.