Preferred Options 2025

Search representations

Results for Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership search

New search New search

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?

Representation ID: 107303

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

Consideration should be made to whether the housing needs of more vulnerable, less mobile groups that rely most significantly on the provision or public and VCS services to maintain their health and wellbeing, access services and employment, should have housing in these more rural locations.

Comments in respect of rural exception sites:

In response to PD-1, would it be possible to promote the opportunity for using Rural Exception Sites as a way to deliver more affordable rural housing schemes? Our experience shows that there are two types of homes that are usually found to be missing within the rural context - small (2 bedroom) bungalows for older persons to downsize to, and small (2 bedroom) houses for young families. Both of these groups benefit from the housing advantages presented by Rural Exception Sites.

Rural communities need to be continually adjusted and transformed to make them attractive places to live and work, and to stabilise the population.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?

Representation ID: 107304

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

We agree in broad terms with the NPPF in respect of new settlements and agree that they can offer the opportunity to start afresh and design a well-planned community with all the attributes of a fulfilling and sustainable place to live.

New settlements need to be of sufficient scale to enable a community to be formed and for it to attract the resources it needs to be sustainable. Therefore a larger new settlement (1000-3000 homes) would be preferred to a series of smaller settlements that cannot afford or justify community facilities, healthcare facilities, pharmacies, nurseries, community builder (community development) roles, etc. etc.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question BW

Representation ID: 107316

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New but well connected - BW/A1/A2 – Good train links, will require community builder capacity for enhanced development of community.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question A1

Representation ID: 107317

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New but well connected - BW/A1/A2 – Good train links, will require community builder capacity for enhanced development of community.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question A2

Representation ID: 107318

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New but well connected - BW/A1/A2 – Good train links, will require community builder capacity for enhanced development of community.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question E1

Representation ID: 107319

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New but really extension of existing - E1/G1 – established albeit new(ish) settlements, no train at present, and therefore more isolated, will require community builder capacity for enhanced development of community.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question G1

Representation ID: 107320

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New but really extension of existing - E1/G1 – established albeit new(ish) settlements, no train at present, and therefore more isolated, will require community builder capacity for enhanced development of community.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question F1

Representation ID: 107321

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New and no connections (rail) - F1, F2, F3, No rail links at present, accessible to employment in Banbury/L/Spa but geographically isolated and potentially limited access to employment.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question F2

Representation ID: 107322

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New and no connections (rail) - F1, F2, F3, No rail links at present, accessible to employment in Banbury/L/Spa but geographically isolated and potentially limited access to employment.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Potential Settlement Question F3

Representation ID: 107323

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Representation Summary:

New and no connections (rail) - F1, F2, F3, No rail links at present, accessible to employment in Banbury/L/Spa but geographically isolated and potentially limited access to employment.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.