Preferred Options 2025

Search representations

Results for Hallam Land search

New search New search

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?

Representation ID: 100981

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

Hallam Land support the inclusion of land East of Coventry Road (HELAA Site Ref: 102) within the Plan for the following reasons:

- The HELAA notes that 89% of the Site is within Priority Area 1.
- Alignment with the Spatial Growth Strategy and South Warwickshire Council’s evidence base has acknowledged the intrinsic sustainability of Kenilworth.
- Alignment with the Overarching Principles
- Having regard to the definition of grey belt and guidance within the NPPG, the Site does not strongly contribute to purposes a), b), or d).

All reasoning is detailed within the attached PDF.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 101007

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The Vision should recognise that there are unmet development needs outside of South Warwickshire that may need to be met within South Warwickshire. A Strategic Objective should also be to meet any unmet housing needs from communities elsewhere that cannot meet their needs, where it is practical and consistent with achieving sustainable development. This would align the strategic objective with the ‘positively prepared’ test of soundness.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG01 Question

Representation ID: 101072

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

Hallam Land support the inclusion of land South of Stoneleigh Road / Kenilworth Road, Kenilworth (HELAA Reference 103 and part of SG01) within the Plan for the following reasons:

- Alignment with the Spatial Growth Strategy -The Site lies entirely within Priority Area 2 in close proximity to Coventry.
- Alignment with the Overarching Principles
- Having regard to the definition of grey belt and guidance within the NPPG, the Site does not strongly contribute to purposes a), b), or d).

Further detail is provided in the attached PDF.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?

Representation ID: 101259

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The South Warwickshire Councils must continually review the Local Housing Need up to adoption, they must consider an increased higher housing need, implement a 5% lapse rate to account for unimplemented commitments, and reassess the existing commitments and windfall allowance as outlined.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?

Representation ID: 101276

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

Hallam Land support the inclusion of land South of Stoneleigh Road / Kenilworth Road, Kenilworth (HELAA Reference 103 and part of SG01) within the Plan and wish to support their representations with the attached Vision Document and Transport Representations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?

Representation ID: 101286

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

It is imperative that the SWLP adequately considers accommodating unmet housing needs arising from outside of South Warwickshire. There are significant unmet needs arising from the GBBCHMA which require attention, and potential unmet needs arising from Coventry which should be taken account of accordingly. There is also potential for unmet needs arising from Cotswold District, Redditch Borough and Solihull Metropolitan Borough which should be considered. Failure to do so would render the SWLP not positively prepared nor effective and thus unsound in line with Paragraph 36 a) and c) of the NPPF.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?

Representation ID: 101289

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

Development proposals should endeavour to deliver the infrastructure set out in the transport strategies outlined, but the SWC’s must acknowledge the ability and need for strategic scale sites to deliver infrastructure that is considered important to a local community but not formally identified within an IDP or other transport strategy. Regarding infrastructure requirements for strategic allocations, the SWCs should collaborate with those bringing the site’s forward to understand site-specific requirements. Allocations with overly onerous infrastructure requirements may delay the delivery of sites due to viability or feasibility concerns. Requirements for infrastructure should not undermine the deliverability of the plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?

Representation ID: 101297

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The Plan should safeguard land for proposed transport infrastructure, however it should also be clear as to how the infrastructure is to be funded and delivered, and how it is to support planned growth within the Plan (i.e. which developments will benefit from the infrastructure and therefore need to contribute to its delivery).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?

Representation ID: 101303

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

Hallam Land consider there are clear sustainability benefits to utilising Green Belt land for development as opposed to channelling all development to non-Green Belt locations. This is particularly the case in so far as land south of Stoneleigh Road (Site ID 103).

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?

Representation ID: 101309

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.