Preferred Options 2025

Other

Representation ID: 102909

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

References to unmet housing needs and request for further detail

Other

Representation ID: 103021

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

The policy should be updated to remove any reference to the HEDNA and instead solely focus on the 2024 standard method as a starting point. Additional adjustments to be made in relation to economic growth and affordability.

Yes

Representation ID: 103082

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Additional information in relation to site REFID 232

Other

Representation ID: 103113

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

Representation ID: 103153

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

The SWLP authorities should accommodate an appropriate proportion of the emerging Greater Birmingham and Black Country Housing Market Area (GBBCHMA) and Coventry and Warwickshire Housing Market Area (CWHMA) housing shortfall to 2050 – once this is established through the publication of a joint evidence base. The SWLP authorities should ensure that the next iteration of the Plan provides a positive and flexible approach to ensure this can happen.

Other

Representation ID: 103209

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough generally support development being consistent with and contributing to the transport strategies referred to within Draft Policy Direction 5. However at this stage the IDP has not been progressed to a point to be able to fully understand the details of the specific transport strategies. In addition to the implementation of the transport strategies, any site specific infrastructure and other requirements in any forthcoming allocation policies will need to be proportionate to the scale of development proposed, based on up-to-date evidence of need and subject to viability (which should be explicitly referenced in the policy wording). These requirements will also need to be justified through the evolving IDP.

Other

Representation ID: 103226

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.

With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.

Other

Representation ID: 103245

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough generally support the overall approach to the Meeting South Warwickshire’s Sustainable Development Requirements chapter, however in order to fully respond and therefore fully support the proposals, a significant amount of additional detail is required.

Other

Representation ID: 103280

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Any future policy must reflect the most up to date evidence. The policy wording should also be flexible and be able to respond to changes to national policies and updated evidence throughout the lifetime of the Plan.

Other

Representation ID: 103300

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.

Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.