Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 102847
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Requesting further clarification
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 102904
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
References to unmet housing needs and request for further detail
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG16 Question
Representation ID: 102935
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Richborough support the proposed growth location SG16 ‘South of Wellesbourne Group’, as this identifies Wellesbourne as a settlement that could support additional growth. It is however requested that the proposed growth location be expanded to include additional areas to the south of Wellesbourne, including land south of Wellesbourne Road, to determine whether a greater level of development could be accommodated in this area. This approach aligns with other proposed growth locations where the SWLP have identified potential sites which have yet to be put forward through the Call for Sites.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
Representation ID: 103017
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
The policy should be updated to remove any reference to the HEDNA and instead solely focus on the 2024 standard method as a starting point. Additional adjustments to be made in relation to economic growth and affordability
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
Representation ID: 103111
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.
Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
Representation ID: 103145
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
The SWLP authorities should accommodate an appropriate proportion of the emerging Greater Birmingham and Black Country Housing Market Area (GBBCHMA) and Coventry and Warwickshire Housing Market Area (CWHMA) housing shortfall to 2050 – once this is established through the publication of a joint evidence base. The SWLP authorities should ensure that the next iteration of the Plan provides a positive and flexible approach to ensure this can happen.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
Representation ID: 103207
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Request for additional information
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
Representation ID: 103224
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 103244
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Richborough generally support the overall approach to the Meeting South Warwickshire’s Sustainable Development Requirements chapter, however in order to fully respond and therefore fully support the proposals, a significant amount of additional detail is required.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
Representation ID: 103279
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Any future policy must reflect the most up to date evidence. The policy wording should also be flexible and be able to respond to changes to national policies and updated evidence throughout the lifetime of the Plan.
