Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 102135
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Comments requesting additional clarification on the Part 1 Plan and the threshold/definition of strategic allocation.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 102140
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Taylor Wimpey supports the overall Vision and Strategic Objectives for the SWLP.
In order to meet the ambitious Vision, it will be important to ensure growth is located in the most sustainable locations and align with the Vision as closely as possible. It is likely that these locations will be located within the Green Belt, such as areas to the north of Leamington.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG06 Question
Representation ID: 102151
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Support for SG06 and additional information in relation to site REFID 531
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
Representation ID: 102177
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Comments relating to housing requirement based on 2024 Standard Method, adjustments relating to economic growth and affordability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
Representation ID: 102196
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Comments in relation to site REFID 531.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
Representation ID: 102213
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Comments relating to GBBCHMA and CWHMA
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
Representation ID: 102224
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Requesting additional information on the IDP
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
Representation ID: 102231
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
It is difficult to provide a full response until further detail is in included within the IDP. The details for the safeguarding of land for transport proposals in relation to Warwick District are relatively high level at this stage.
It is recognised that this further work is to be undertaken between now and the consultation on the regulation 19 version of the SWLP, but it is necessary to have discussions with those with land interests directly impacted by the strategies within the IDP and Policy Direction 6 ahead of the next round of consultation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
Representation ID: 102240
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Comments in relation to locating development in the most sustainable locations
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
Representation ID: 102243
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Taylor Wimpey has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
In respect of any overarching Design Code to be adopted by the Council, this should give a degree of flexibility to allow consideration on a site-by-site basis and to ensure it remains adaptable to a changing market and cross reference Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’.
