Preferred Options 2025

Search representations

Results for Alamo search

New search New search

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 95256

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

A longer plan period accords with guidance para 22 of the NPPF. A two part plan will delay the identification of smaller non-strategic allocation which should be addressed through a policy provision to allow such sites to come forward in advance of the part 2 plan.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 95263

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

Alamo are concerned the objectives will not be met. Specifically we are concerned about the intention to produce a two part plan which will delay allocations coming forward in sustainable settlements such as Salford Priors.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?

Representation ID: 95268

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

We have concerns over the use of the Cov and Warks HEDNA rather than the standard method, the uplift to the standard method, use of lapse rates and non implementation and existing commitments.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?

Representation ID: 95269

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

We generally support the recognition that new settlements and expanding settlements is required to meet the housing and employment growth requirements and is the most sustainable way of achieving this. However, we consider that large scale development proposals such as these should be complimented by a range of smaller scale allocations in the sustainable settlements such as Salford Priors in order to deliver much needed market and affordable housing in the short term.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?

Representation ID: 95276

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

Whilst we welcome the valuable role that small sites can play in delivering the DIstrict's housing needs we are concerned about the delay in bringing forward such allocations by way of a part 2 plan. A mechanism should be introduced that will allow developments in sustainable settlements such as Salford Priors to come forward ahead of the part 2 plan being adopted.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?

Representation ID: 95280

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

Smaller sites are less infrastructure intensive and can come on stream more quickly. The spatial strategy should incorporate a mix of large sites along with smaller sites in the sustainable settlements.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?

Representation ID: 95286

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

Density and the achievement of specific levels will have a number of wider impacts and affect other policy goals such as POS, BNG and NDSS. if all are to be achieved then the council will need to ensure that sufficient land is allocated.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?

Representation ID: 95292

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

Due to the high demand for affordable housing we contend that the housing requirement should be higher to meet this need.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?

Representation ID: 95293

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

The requisite evidence to warrant all new houses accord with NDSS is not provided

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?

Representation ID: 95295

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

No evidence to warrant 5% self build plots on large allocated sites. self builders would be looking for a unique site rather than an undeveloped plot on a housing estate.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.