Preferred Options 2025

Yes

Representation ID: 94684

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Bubbenhall Parish Council

We recognise that the approach taken is an effort to simplify this challenging work

Yes

Representation ID: 94695

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Bubbenhall Parish Council

The Vision and Strategic Objectives all establish a good set of standards to work to.

Other

Representation ID: 94866

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Bubbenhall Parish Council

The current exclusive focus on a gigafactory covering this whole site is extremely disappointing and lacking in imagination, particularly when the whole EV sector is in an uncertain position.
As an example, this is potentially a very useful airport for advanced air mobility (AAM) technology, which is developing rapidly around the world. Allocation of some of the site for AAM could create interest in such developments for both battery powered and hydrogen-powered aircraft.
AAM development would not need the whole airport and it would be good to see it considered.

Yes

Representation ID: 95041

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Bubbenhall Parish Council

The five sites within Bubbenhall village - 155, 213, 636, would all suffer from very poor road access, essentially by old, narrow, and winding lanes, and it is difficult to seeing those routes accommodating the numbers of houses forecast.
The heritage features of the village, including a listed public house, would also be impacted to a greater or lesser degree.
The two sites on the edge of the village, 671 and its larger version 695, would overwhelm the village in numbers of properties by between 2 and 8 times, which would be incongruous.

Yes

Representation ID: 95117

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Bubbenhall Parish Council

Further explanation of why 636, 671 and 695 are inappropriate proposals as the local road routes and village facilities cannot sustain the size of these developments.